Re: [foaf-protocols] owl:Restrictions in ACL - was Re: ACL Ontology and Discussion

Story Henry wrote: > This is why we were writing the authorization out not as you have above, but > as > > [] a acl:Authorization ; > acl:accessTo ; > acl:agentClass [ owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction; > owl:hasValue

Re: [foaf-protocols] owl:Restrictions in ACL - was Re: ACL Ontology and Discussion

I think it would be nice if you went off to study "Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist" before asking any more questions on this group. Currently it would be like a php person coming to a php group, who never really even looked at a php grammar, syntax, or got a simple php program to run. And

Re: LOD Camp at WWW2010....

On 21/04/2010 20:51, Matthew Rowe wrote: Do you not think that is quite expensive? I am not the one deciding what the WWW2010 conference fees should be. W3C is not organizing this event. I am interested in attending the linked open data camp, but I am not registered for the main conference -

Re: [foaf-protocols] owl:Restrictions in ACL - was Re: ACL Ontology and Discussion

Nathan wrote: > Joe Presbrey wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Nathan wrote: um.. this doesn't cover the foaf:knows, but *may* cover the sioc:has_member functionality.. [] a acl:Authorization ; acl:accessTo ; acl:agentClass

Re: [foaf-protocols] owl:Restrictions in ACL - was Re: ACL Ontology and Discussion

Joe Presbrey wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Nathan wrote: I'm not sure about the Gx dereference at this point. I guess this is analogous to multiple groups being defined in the same graph and distinguished by fragment. Are you planning to do this like: >> more GET uri,

eClassOWL 5.1.4 Ontology for Products and Services

Dear all: eClassOWL, initially released in 2004, has since been the most comprehensive and mature Web ontology for types of products and services. It defines classes for more than 30,000 product types and more than 5,000 properties for product features. Under the hood, eClassOWL is a non-tri

Re: [foaf-protocols] owl:Restrictions in ACL - was Re: ACL Ontology and Discussion

Story Henry wrote: > On 21 Apr 2010, at 16:58, Joe Presbrey wrote: > >>> Sadly, I'm going to have to implement the above in the short term though >>> as can't for the life of me see any other way of expressing: >>> >>> if graph holds the triple. >>> where is found by dereferencing >>> whe

Re: LOD Camp at WWW2010....

Do you not think that is quite expensive? I am interested in attending the linked open data camp, but I am not registered for the main conference - instead attending workshops and the web science conference. Is there any chance to have a similar fee to the FutureWeb event? thanks On 21 Apr 20

Re: [foaf-protocols] owl:Restrictions in ACL - was Re: ACL Ontology and Discussion

On 21 Apr 2010, at 16:58, Joe Presbrey wrote: >> Sadly, I'm going to have to implement the above in the short term though >> as can't for the life of me see any other way of expressing: >> >> if graph holds the triple. >> where is found by dereferencing >> where and are defined in the

Announcing DBTune.org/classical

Hello, We are proud to announce a new Linked Data resource at DBTune.org that relates to the canon of Western Classical Music. Data has been aggregate from several sources on the document Web, translated to RDF, cleaned, and to some extent, hand edited by Chris Cannam of the Centre for Digital Mu

CFP Special Issue of the Journal of Web Semantics on Semantic Web Dynamics

CALL FOR PAPERS Journal of Web Semantics Special Issue on Semantic Web Dynamics Description Recent years have witnessed the arrival of more and more semantically annotated data and related ontologies in the

CFP Special Issue of the Journal of Web Semantics on Semantic Web Dynamics

CALL FOR PAPERS Journal of Web Semantics Special Issue on Semantic Web Dynamics Description Recent years have witnessed the arrival of more and more semantically annotated data and related ontologies in the

Re: LInked Data events in the US between July 12-25

On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > Aldo Bucchi wrote: >> >> I'll take that as a no ;) >> >> On Monday, April 12, 2010, Aldo Bucchi wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there any interesting Linked Data event in the US anytime between >>> July 12 - 25th? >>> >>> Thx, >>> A >>> >

Re: [foaf-protocols] owl:Restrictions in ACL - was Re: ACL Ontology and Discussion

Story Henry wrote: > > On 21 Apr 2010, at 11:36, Nathan wrote: >> [ ✂ ] they are, but as you know "Harry says that his father is Joe" and "Joe >> says that his son is Harry" are different things, in different >> situations you may choose to believe one party, the other party or only >> believe the

Re: [foaf-protocols] owl:Restrictions in ACL - was Re: ACL Ontology and Discussion

On 21 Apr 2010, at 11:36, Nathan wrote: > [ ✂ ] they are, but as you know "Harry says that his father is Joe" and "Joe > says that his son is Harry" are different things, in different > situations you may choose to believe one party, the other party or only > believe the statement(s) if both part

Re: [foaf-protocols] owl:Restrictions in ACL - was Re: ACL Ontology and Discussion

Story Henry wrote: > On 21 Apr 2010, at 09:17, Nathan wrote: > >> Story Henry wrote: >> >>> On 21 Apr 2010, at 03:44, Nathan wrote: [ ✄ ] figured it - finally.. (?) _:group owl:equivalentClass [ a owl:Restriction ; owl:hasValue

Re: [foaf-protocols] owl:Restrictions in ACL - was Re: ACL Ontology and Discussion

On 21 Apr 2010, at 09:17, Nathan wrote: > Story Henry wrote: > >> On 21 Apr 2010, at 03:44, Nathan wrote: >>> [ ✄ ] figured it - finally.. (?) >>> >>> _:group owl:equivalentClass [ >>> a owl:Restriction ; >>> owl:hasValue ; >>> owl:onProperty [

GoodRelations Ontology: Update + New Features + New Documentation

Dear all: We just released a service update to the GoodRelations ontology for e-commerce. The update is backwards-compatible to previous releases and mainly adds additional properties that are important for the rental and accommodation business. We also redesigned the complete language referen

Re: [foaf-protocols] owl:Restrictions in ACL - was Re: ACL Ontology and Discussion

Story Henry wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > it seems to me you need to invest in an introductory book on the semantic web. > I suggest "Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist" by Dean Allemang > which I reviewed here > >http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/semantic_web_for_the_working > > It is very

Re: LOD Camp at WWW2010....

Hello Ed, I just looked at the WWW2010 registration page (http://www2010.org/www/attendees/register/), and it reads: "April 26-30 ; 1-day pass ; $495 – Regular ; $295 – Student" The 75USD (student rate) is for the FutureWeb event. Best regards, - Marie-Claire. On 21/04/2010 09:39, Ivan He

Re: LOD Camp at WWW2010....

Ed, I have forwarded your question to Marie-Claire Forgue who handles the practicalities... Stay tuned! Ivan On Apr 20, 2010, at 18:56 , Ed Summers wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > So it looks like students could go to the entire day of Linked Open > Data Camp by paying $75.00? > > //Ed > > On Tue, A