Re: Vote for my Semantic Web presentation at SXSW

2011-08-19 Thread adasal
Hi, Nova Spivack Tweeted this link:- http://www.franz.com/about/press_room/trillion-triples.lhtml I think this qualifies and is well worth reading. There certainly is intense interest in Semantic technologies and they are being pushed into the NoSQL arena. Adam On 18 August 2011 16:02, Hugh Glas

Re: ANN: Sparallax! - Browse sets of things together (now those on your SPARQL endpoint)

2011-08-19 Thread Danny Ayers
On 19 August 2011 16:46, Igor Popov wrote: > Hi Danny, > I've been working on a SPARQL Exploration tool prototype that is a combining > ontology+data exploration and allows you to export data as spreadsheets (you > can check a DBPedia implementation of it http://visor.psi.enakting.org/). > It's al

Re: Cost/Benefit Anyone? Re: Vote for my Semantic Web presentation at SXSW

2011-08-19 Thread Patrick Logan
As fascinating as this discussion is, maybe the two of you want to work it out directly and then report back with a summary? Speaking as just one subscriber's data point, of course, I'm... -Patrick On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Patrick Durusau wrote: > Kingsley, > > Correction: I have never

New draft of Linked Data Patterns book

2011-08-19 Thread Leigh Dodds
Hi, There's a new draft of the Linked Data patterns book available, with 12 new patterns, mainly in the application patterns section. The latest version is available from here: http://patterns.dataincubator.org/book/ There are PDF and EPUB versions linked from the homepage. The source is also a

Re: Cost/Benefit Anyone? Re: Vote for my Semantic Web presentation at SXSW

2011-08-19 Thread Patrick Durusau
Kingsley, Correction: I have never accused you of being modest or of not being an accountant. ;-) Nor have I said the costs you talk about in your accountant voice don't exist. The problem is identifying the cost to a particular client, say of email spam, versus the cost the solution for t

Re: Cost/Benefit Anyone? Re: Vote for my Semantic Web presentation at SXSW

2011-08-19 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 8/19/11 6:37 AM, Patrick Durusau wrote: Kingsley, One more attempt. The "press release" I pointed to was an example that would have to be particularized to a CIO or CTO in term of *their* expenses of integration, then showing *their* savings. Yes, and I sent you a link to a collection of

Re: ANN: Sparallax! - Browse sets of things together (now those on your SPARQL endpoint)

2011-08-19 Thread adasal
Lovely. Wouldn't it be a shame if google became so intelligent that it didn't? I take 't'facet' means 'to face it', actually what does it mean? google was offering me results to "facet" before (Northern English > filter - looking for t'facet :) > Adam On 19 August 2011 11:28, Danny Ayers wrote

Re: Cost/Benefit Anyone? Re: Vote for my Semantic Web presentation at SXSW

2011-08-19 Thread Patrick Durusau
Kingsley, One more attempt. The "press release" I pointed to was an example that would have to be particularized to a CIO or CTO in term of *their* expenses of integration, then showing *their* savings. The difference in our positions, from my "context," is that I am saying the benefit to e

Re: ANN: Sparallax! - Browse sets of things together (now those on your SPARQL endpoint)

2011-08-19 Thread Danny Ayers
On 19 August 2011 12:18, Danny Ayers wrote: > On 18 August 2011 02:37, Giovanni Tummarello > wrote: >> On the other hand in terms of browser i am going to be sponsoring >> development of TFacets , > > Link? http://www.visualdataweb.org/tfacet.php google was offering me results to "facet" befor

Re: ANN: Sparallax! - Browse sets of things together (now those on your SPARQL endpoint)

2011-08-19 Thread Danny Ayers
On 18 August 2011 02:37, Giovanni Tummarello wrote: > Hi Danny, > > i liked sparallax a lot, problem is its hard to maintain. David didnt > upgrade parallax any longer and the intern who did the "sparql to MQL" > conversion that allows sparallax to operate on sparql is now not > working with us an