***Apologies for cross-posting***
CALL FOR PAPERS
1st International Workshop on the
Digital Preservation of Research Methods and Artefacts (DPRMA 2013)
http://dprma.oerc.ox.ac.uk/
25th July 2013,
It's high time universities stopped judging academics by *where* they
have published rather than *what*.
We already have a form of rating for journals. It's called impact
factor. It doesn't work, because judging papers by their place of
publication is nonsensical.
Linked data and semantic web
IIRC, impact factor was only ever intended as an heuristic for librarians
when making marginal decisions over which journals to subscribe to on
behalf of their institution. Everything else is but mission creep.
All the best,
Leon
On 23 April 2013 12:38, Phillip Lord
[Apologies for cross-posting]
*** Registration deadline extended until 24th of May ***
Free and premium open data and APIs – an opportunity to explore the best
of both worlds
Join from anywhere in the world!
= Participate in the K-Cap - Datathon:
+1
The Nominations in the Semantic Asset Utilization Category:
Best catch: Milton
Best Intelligent Life in Journalism Discovery: NOAA New York Times
Best Village Idiot Impersonation, don't believe it for a minute: Phil I'm just
a ...
Best Monte Carlo Simulation Marksmanship: Leon ... Mission
(apologies for cross-posting)
NEW DEADLINE: May 12, 2013
=
7th International Workshop on Applications of Semantic Technologies
(AST 2013)
http://ast2013.fzi.de/
at
Dear LOD community,
I would like to draw your attention to a tutorial on
Linked Data Query Processing
that will take place on May 14, 2013, as part of the 22nd International World
Wide Web Conference in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
For more information see:
On 22 Apr 2013, at 12:18, Phillip Lord phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk wrote:
snip
We need to check for content negotiation; I'm not clear, though, how we
are supposed to know what forms of content are available. Is there
anyway we can tell from your website that content negotiation is
possible?
On 4/23/13 1:42 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
We need to check for content negotiation; I'm not clear, though, how we
are supposed to know what forms of content are available. Is there
anyway we can tell from your website that content negotiation is
possible?
You can start with vapour [1], assuming you
Maybe I should rephrase rating and grading and the term mental narrow focus
reflects the fact that scientists and researchers when concentrating on their
academic work focus on a small area of all scientific endeavors. There is a
subtle difference between mental narrow focus and narrow
IMO the web makes the traditional publishing bottleneck obsolete --
including the need for peer review, which is mostly just a crude method
of indicating endorsement.
Perhaps researchers should now publish their work on Facebook, Google+
or other votable media, and their institutions should
Thanks Kingsley.
Yeah, Vapour is cool, but it doesn't address my question.
(Which actually seems to have got lost from your response.)
Best
On 23 Apr 2013, at 19:03, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 4/23/13 1:42 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
We need to check for content negotiation;
*** Apologies for cross-posting ***
LISC2013 - First Call for Papers
3rd International Workshop on Linked Science 2013—Supporting Reproducibility,
Scientific Investigations and Experiments (LISC2013)
October 21st or 22nd, 2013
Sydney, Australia
Collocated with the 12th
International
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
On 22 Apr 2013, at 12:18, Phillip Lord phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk wrote:
snip
We need to check for content negotiation; I'm not clear, though, how we
are supposed to know what forms of content are available. Is there
Ah of course - thanks Mark, silly me.
So I look at the Link: header for something like
curl -L -i http://dbpedia.org/resource/Luton
Which gives me the information I want.
Anyone got any offers for how I would use Linked Data to get this into my RDF
store?
So then I can do things something like:
On 4/23/13 2:49 PM, Mark Baker wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
On 22 Apr 2013, at 12:18, Phillip Lord phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk wrote:
snip
We need to check for content negotiation; I'm not clear, though, how we
are supposed to know what forms
On 4/23/13 3:39 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Ah of course - thanks Mark, silly me.
So I look at the Link: header for something like
curl -L -i http://dbpedia.org/resource/Luton
Which gives me the information I want.
Anyone got any offers for how I would use Linked Data to get this into my RDF
store?
On 04/23/2013 08:48 PM, Erp, M.G.J. van wrote:
Submissions should be formatted according to the Lecture Notes in
Computer Science guidelines for proceedings available at
http://www.springer.com/computer/lncs?SGWID=0-164-7-72376-0 and
submitted to
Ah, thanks for the Web101 course. :-)
Sorry, I usually live in a Linked Data world, so I don't think about html stuff
such as
link rel=alternate …
because (like the header) it doesn't appear in the RDF.
On 23 Apr 2013, at 20:54, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com
wrote:
On 4/23/13 3:39
On 4/23/13 4:23 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Ah, thanks for the Web101 course.:-)
Sorry, I usually live in a Linked Data world, so I don't think about html stuff
such as
link rel=alternate …
because (like the header) it doesn't appear in the RDF.
On 23 Apr 2013, at 20:54, Kingsley
Ah POWDER - of course.
It all comes together :-)
(Sorry if this is boring and obvious to others - and thanks Kingsley.)
So last (?!) 2 things, if I may.
Any proposal to attach types to the objects of the wdrs:desribedby triples?
Any proposal so that I can infer the available types for the whole
On Apr 23, 2013, at 16:11, Sarven Capadisli i...@csarven.ca wrote:
On 04/23/2013 08:48 PM, Erp, M.G.J. van wrote:
Submissions should be formatted according to the Lecture Notes in
Computer Science guidelines for proceedings available at
On 4/23/13 5:04 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Ah POWDER - of course.
It all comes together :-)
(Sorry if this is boring and obvious to others - and thanks Kingsley.)
So last (?!) 2 things, if I may.
Any proposal to attach types to the objects of the wdrs:desribedby triples?
So as in
Hi
As an organizer of both this workshop and one called the Beyond the PDF
force11.org/beyondthepdf2 - I'll respond.
There's nothing particularly wrong with PDF as a means of encapsulating human
readable information so asking for submissions this way seems suitable. (Yes
there are downsides
Hi Paul,
No offense intended. It certainly isn't your fault that you can't modernize the
academic publishing industry overnight. Nobody expects that.
However, I do sympathize with Sarven. It won't change if we can't show the
publishers a more compelling way to do there work. That includes
Hi David,
No offense taken.
I'm sympathetic as well in terms of encouraging new forms of publication
and in particular encouraging machine readable information. I just don't
think necessarily pdf submissions prevent one from doing all that.
so I think we are pretty much all on the same page :-)
Oh and if you want to see a massive thread on the benefits and upsides to
pdf as a format check out:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/beyond-the-pdf/WskBVfAH9Co
and as always when talking about pdf one most see
Beyond the PDF - The Horror Movie (
The way science and research in general is financed has a great influence on
academic and research publications.
For scientists and researchers with tenure, those at work in independent
research institutes and students and other staff often times demands are placed
on publications in terms of
Hello LOD Community,
We are working on a research project for generating and publishing RDF
graphs from relational database. In this stage, we want to develop a
tool for incremental updating of RDF graphs into a triplestore using
SPARQL. However, we want to know about others similar tools
29 matches
Mail list logo
