As someone who looked fairly deeply into owl:sameAs use, the problem is not
fatal but is endemic. Nonetheless about 1/3 of the sameAs usages are
actually more or less similarity and better handled by statistics. The rest
require likely domain specific predicates. Logic and the world do not layer
As is well-known, (X)HTML+RDFa as a conference proceeding format has failed
due to links, inability to make conformant (X)HTML, and RDFa being
generally hard to write.
I think ePub (HTML5 profile) will solve these, and when that is more
mature, I'd be happy to switch conferences I'm co-chairing
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:
On 4/3/13 6:06 PM, Harry Halpin wrote:
Is there a list of WebApps that actually consume Linked Data?
Does anyone know of any sites that actually use RDF as a backend?
Crossing fingers.
There's been a whole
:
http://www.w3.org/2011/09/LinkedData/ledp2011_submission_1.pdf
That's exactly the type of example I'm looking for. Any others?
Martynas
graphity.org
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Harry Halpin hhal...@ibiblio.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:25 AM, Kingsley Idehen
kide
Is there a list of WebApps that actually consume Linked Data?
Does anyone know of any sites that actually use RDF as a backend?
Crossing fingers.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:
On 4/3/13 5:32 PM, Hugh Glaser wrote:
Because it is. :-)
Along
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Sarven Capadisli i...@csarven.ca wrote:
Dear community,
I would like to know which venues (e.g., conferences, journals) are out
there that accepts research documents in (X)HTML+CSS+JavaScript+MathML+**SVG
etc. as the primary and final format. On that note,
2013: Web Science 2013 Workshops, Paris, France
General Chairs
Hugh Davis, University of Southampton, UK
Harry Halpin, W3C/IRI, France
Alex “Sandy” Pentland, MIT, USA
Proceedings Chair
Matthew S. Webber, Rutgers University
Program Chairs
Mark Bernstein, Eastgate Systems, Inc. USA
Lada
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
David Wood wrote:
On Jan 19, 2011, at 10:59, Nathan wrote:
ps: as an illustration of how engrained URI normalization is, I've
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:15 PM, David Wood da...@3roundstones.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've collected my thoughts on The Great 303 Debate of 2010 (as it will be
remembered) at:
http://prototypo.blogspot.com/2010/11/another-guide-to-publishing-linked-data.html
Briefly, I propose a new HTTP
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Ian Davis m...@iandavis.com wrote:
Hi all,
The subject of this email is the title of a blog post I wrote last
night questioning whether we actually need to continue with the 303
redirect approach for Linked Data. My suggestion is that replacing it
with a 200
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Ian Davis m...@iandavis.com wrote:
On Thursday, November 4, 2010, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Please, don't.
303 is a PITA, and it has detrimental affects across the board from network
load through to server admin. Likewise #frag URIs have there own set of
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Juan Sequeda juanfeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody
I just stumbled on XRI and XDI:
http://www.xdi.org/modules/tut3/index.php?id=2
A quick overview of this seems that it is the same thing as Linked Data. XRI
are identifiers (URIs) and XDI is a data
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:17 PM, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
On Jun 30, 2010, at 1:15 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
On Jun 30, 2010, at 6:45 AM, Toby Inkster wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:54:20 +0100
Dan Brickley
Everyone,
Also, note we'll be having a breakout session today for hacking
around with the Open Graph Protocol with David Recordon (from
Facebook, whose joined the Linked Data Camp for the afternoon), and
he's interested in working on the draft mapping schema for the Open
Graph Protocol, which
There's also the new vCard update [1] that lists a relatively
universally accepted way of representing RDF that is picked up by
SearchMonkey, Google, etc.
http://www.w3.org/Submission/2010/SUBM-vcard-rdf-20100120/
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Stephane Fellah fella...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Amsterdam)
Vinay K. Chaudhri (SRI International)
Deborah McGuinness (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)
Harry Halpin (University of Edinburgh)
Program Committee:
Ji Bao (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)
Chris Bizer (Freie Universitat Berlin)
Paolo Bouqeut (Trento)
Dan Connolly (W3C)
Richard Cyganiak
)
Deborah McGuinness (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)
Harry Halpin (University of Edinburgh)
Program Committee:
Ji Bao (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)
Chris Bizer (Freie Universitat Berlin)
Paolo Bouqeut (Trento)
Richard Cyganiak (DERI)
Li Ding (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)
An Hai Doan
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Martin Hepp (UniBW)
martin.h...@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote:
Dear all:
As far as I can see, there are now two vCard variants in use - the original
http://www.w3.org/2001/vcard-rdf/3.0#
and the new one
http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#
In general, the new one
John
--
John Graybeal mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 831-775-1956
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org
--
--harry
Harry Halpin
Informatics, University
Hugh Glaser wrote:
Thanks guys, a really interesting and important discussion.
However, after the last couple of postings I have the feeling I may agree
with both of you.
Is that possible?
Bijan et. al. are right about the semantics of owl:sameAs, but as I've
said before, I think that
20 matches
Mail list logo
