On Wednesday 30. March 2016 10.19.51 Krzysztof Janowicz wrote:
> > +1 for publishing structured CfPs (by having guidlines as Ruben
> > sugested) I am not sure if Schema.org or other existing vocabularies
> > have a suitable schema for CfPs.
>
> Let's not make this complicated. A simple plain text
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Ph.D. Research Fellow, Semantic Web
Department of Informatics, University of Oslo
kje...@kjernsmo.net
Hi all!
I hope it is OK that I just burst in here without having followed the
discussion. Admittedly, I haven't been terribly interested, I've always
enjoyed the 303 dance, I wrote the code and it was easy, and the IR/NIR
distinction has always served me well. However, I also see that it is a
On Wednesday 28. March 2012 08.52.12 Jonathan A Rees wrote:
The reason I prepared the survey is because the same ideas keep coming
up over and over again in this context, and, understandably, quite
often people coming into the discussion aren't aware of what has come
before in its ten-year
On Wednesday 28. March 2012 14.37.42 Jeni Tennison wrote:
I don't think it's web hosters who would find it hard to deploy, rather that
people who just want to publish some data on some tiny patch of web space
that they own, often actually run by outsourced IT departments, do not
typically have
Wed 28 mars 2012 16:35, Dave Reynolds wrote:
This particular piece of the puzzle is not a technology or tools issue.
The web hosting in those cases is perfectly capable of publishing static
files or allowing content in the head of an html document. It is an
organizational and social issue.
I
On Friday 17. February 2012 02.19.15 Yang Squared wrote:
Hi all,
I have an Web architecture question here.
Assume I have a information resource URI http://example.com/homepage.html
I would like to publish a RDF metadata
(http://example.com/data/homepagerdf) about
this information
On Tuesday 14. February 2012 01.16.50 Mika Singh wrote:
Would somebody would guide me how can I convert such a record into
RDF/Linked data?
If you are prepared to do a little bit of simple programming, I would suggest
converting it with a simple Perl script using the module RDF::Helper:
All,
I have published a Perl module called RDF::LinkedData. It is a simple module
that can take a triple store as config and if any of the URIs in that triple
store is dereferencable on the host it is run on, it will do the 303 dance and
conneg to either a /data or /page suffix. Really simple
it is certainly a worthwhile addition.
Best,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
PhD Research Fellow, University of Oslo, Norway
Semantic Web / SPARQL Query Federation
kje...@kjernsmo.net http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
On Wednesday 4. January 2012 15.24.16 Frans Knibbe | Geodan wrote:
Hello,
I have a (hopefully) simple question: What can you expect when you
dereference the URI of a named graph?
This working draft sort of answers that question:
http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/
but as Ivan
of Informatics, University of Oslo in
collaboration with the Norwegian Ministry of Government Administration,
Reform and Church Affairs. The venue is the Department of Informatics.
Please put your name on the wiki above if you'd like to join!
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
PhD Research Fellow
and do the 303 dance.
I really don't see a point in deprecating number two, and making a huge
fuzz about it, as long as they can do number one.
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Ph.d Research Fellow, Semantic Web
kje...@kjernsmo.net
http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
Torsdag 04 november 2010 16:21, skrev Giovanni Tummarello:
..but its so deployed now
I have to admit, that would be my response. I wrote the code and it was really
easy. My impression is that people have very few issues with the 303, what
they may feel unfamiliar is the need to use different
:-)
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
kje...@kjernsmo.net
http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
to merge data using the older URIs.
I suppose I could use it to redirect URI's for the same hostname, that may
indeed work, though something more explicit would be nice, I think.
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
kje...@kjernsmo.net
http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
think I'll try
to use that too!
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
kje...@kjernsmo.net
http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
Hi all!
Cool URIs don't change, but cool content does, so the problem surfaces that I
need to permanently redirect now and then. I discussed this problem in a
meetup yesterday, and it turns out that people have found dbpedia problematic
to use because it is too much of a moving target, when a
Inkster is the author of a large number of RDF-related Perl modules on
CPAN, including RDFa parsers, HTML5 microdata parsers, FOAF+SSL
authentication modules, etc. He is also a co- inventor of the FOAF+SSL
protocol.
Kjetil Kjernsmo is the local organiser, and has been following the RDF
world
, I'm leaving the
semweb world, hopefully temporarily, to learn the tools that good
developers are using. I believe that we're not going forward unless we can
provide developer tools, and they are not there.
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
kje...@kjernsmo.net
http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
should probably use the geonames:Feature class, etc.
This Wiki doesn't make it clear to me if it is the purpose to address such
concerns.
Best,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
kje...@kjernsmo.net
http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/
,
and what they did to meet these needs.
Eventually, this will evolve into a reference site with best practices for
each problem newcomers present, and provide a launchpad for ventures beyond
what's there with minimal cost.
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
kje...@kjernsmo.net
http
On Friday 25. September 2009 10:15:34 you wrote:
sorry if I sound negative, I reckon the semweb is a done deal now, the
many-eyeballs arrived.
Thanks for asking the right questions, Danny, I believe it is critical for
the success that someone does!
but - where should we take it?
What I'd
All,
I just wanted to have a few elevations of mountains:
PREFIX pr: http://dbpedia.org/property/
select distinct * where
{
?uri a http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Mountain ;
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/elevation ?elev ;
pr:name ?name ;
pr:range
of ontologies, from the informal SKOS
thesauri to the formal rigorous OWL Big-O ontologies makes sense for
different things, but that one should be aware of strengths and
weaknesses for each application, and that some things may take a couple
of years to get there.
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil
:_Hardware_components_search
That also needs a bit more thinking, and the standards aren't even
there, so there is still work to do here. :-)
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer
kje...@kjernsmo.net
Homepage: http
All,
I was just wondering whether anybody has a SPARQL Endpoint for lingvoj.org
data? We found that importing it all was a little too much, so we figured
that the best way to get the subset that we want is to CONSTRUCT it, if it is
somewhere.
Cheers,
Kjetil
/LinkedDataPlanetMeetup
Cheers,
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC
on Monday if people are around. How are your plans?
Kjetil
--
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBC
29 matches
Mail list logo