On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Svensson, Lars l.svens...@dnb.de wrote:
Mark,
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Martynas Jusevičius
marty...@graphity.org wrote:
On the other hand, it seems like you want different descriptions of a
resource -- so it seems to me that these should in fact be
On Aug 22, 2014 12:23 PM, Ruben Verborgh ruben.verbo...@ugent.be wrote:
This gets us to a deeper difference between (current) Linked Data and the
rest of the Web:
Linked Data uses only links as hypermedia controls,
whereas the remainder of the Web uses links *and forms*.
Forms are a much more
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Christian Bizer ch...@bizer.de wrote:
Hi,
But I wonder where so many other sites (including mine) went ?
The problem with crawling the Web of Linked Data is really that it is hard to
get the datasets on the edges that set RDF links to other sources but are
Link exchange over HTTP, awesome. I hope you support the 402 status code ;)
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Markus Lanthaler
markus.lantha...@gmx.net wrote:
+public-hydra
On Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:11 PM, Mark Baker wrote:
Cool. Very similar to RDF Forms in important ways, though I think RDF
Forms internalizes some useful features that Hydra could benefit from
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Markus Lanthaler
markus.lantha...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi Ruben,
You probably already expected me asking this :-) Why not Hydra [1]?
Cool. Very similar to RDF Forms in important ways, though I think RDF
Forms internalizes some useful features that Hydra could benefit
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 5/30/13 9:13 AM, Andrea Splendiani wrote:
Hi,
let me get back to this thread for two reasons.
1) I was wondering whether the report on DBPedia queries cited below was
already published.
2) I have recently
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
On 22 Apr 2013, at 12:18, Phillip Lord phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk wrote:
snip
We need to check for content negotiation; I'm not clear, though, how we
are supposed to know what forms of content are available. Is there
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
The original query language you describe is what makes the Web, the
Web. We can't just swap it out and expect the resulting architecture
to still be the Web and exhibit its same desirable architectural
properties.
Kingsley,
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
The global Web is a functional Data Space equipped with a declarative query
language based on the Web's architectural essence (URIs and HTTP). It can
work, and will work. The challenge is getting folks to
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Rob Warren war...@muninn-project.org wrote:
Hi Rob,
There is a fundamental problem with HTTP status codes.
Lets say a user submits a complex but small sparql request.
My server sees the syntax is good and starts to reply in good faith.
This means the server
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Barry Norton
barry.nor...@ontotext.com wrote:
On 18/04/2013 15:35, Jürgen Jakobitsch SWC wrote:
I think the problem is that many people (especially web developers) have
not yet realized that SPARQL *IS* already a REST API
May I rephrase? SPARQL is already
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Markus Luczak-Rösch
markus.luczak-roe...@fu-berlin.de wrote:
Hi all!
Since on the LDOW11 and USEWOD workshops at WWW there was the recent
discussion about using HTTP referrers properly when browsing, crawling
etc. linked data (short using it) I would like to
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Damian Steer d.st...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry for changing the topic (and, indeed, sailing off list topic).
On 24/02/11 18:28, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
http://www.w3.org/wiki/CORS_Enabled
[reproduced for
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
in addition adding the extension .n3 / .rdf to the uri causes content
RDF to be returned instead.
How is that information communicated to the world? Is it documented
somewhere, or expressed in-band? If not the latter, then I'd
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
actually.. how about this..
Expressing the links in HTML is fine too.
GET /user/23 HTTP/1.1
Host: example.org
Accept: application/rdf+xml
--
HTTP/1.1 200 Ok
Content-Type: application/rdf+xml
Link:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Nathan: see URIBurner or DBpedia responses which also include LINK response
headers :-)
I had no idea the community was using it. Excellent!
Sequence example via cURL:
kidehen$ curl -I -H Accept: text/html
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Michael Nelson m...@cs.odu.edu wrote:
I disagree. I would say that agent-driven negotiation is by far the
most common form of conneg in use today. Only it's not done through
standardized means such as the Alternates header, but instead via
language and format
Michael,
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Michael Nelson m...@cs.odu.edu wrote:
What you describe is really close to what RFC 2616 calls Agent-driven
Negotiation, which is how CN exists in the absence of Accept-* request
headers.
That's correct.
But the TCN: Choice approach is introduced as
Herbert,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Herbert Van de Sompel
hvds...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to let you know that our response to some issues re Memento raised here
and on Pete Johnston's blog post
(http://efoundations.typepad.com/efoundations/2009/11/memento-and-negotiating-on-time.html) is
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Peter Ansell ansell.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
The issue with requiring people to direct requests at the URI for the
Resource X at time T is that the circular linking issue I described
previously comes into play because people need to pre-engineer their
URI's to be
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Chris Bizer ch...@bizer.de wrote:
Hi Michael, Georgi and all,
just to complete the list of proposals, here another one from Herbert Van de
Sompel from the Open Archives Initiative.
Memento: Time Travel for the Web
http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.1112
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Peter Ansell ansell.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
It should be up to resource creators to determine when the nature of a
resource changes across time. A web architecture that requires every
single edit to have a different identifier is a large hassle and
likely won't
23 matches
Mail list logo
