The tabulator widget library has a table widget which automatically adds filter
strings or numeric range filters and sort arrows at the top of each table
column making a low profile faceted browser. Ilaria Liccardi wrote it. It us
used in a generic class member property table, and in a number
On 2014-11 -11, at 09:00, Hollink, L. l.holl...@vu.nl wrote:
On 08 Nov 2014, at 17:20, Tim Berners-Lee ti...@w3.org wrote:
On 2014-11 -05, at 11:19, Hollink, L. l.holl...@vu.nl wrote:
- Dataset announcement -
We are happy to announce the release of a new linked dataset
On 2014-11 -05, at 11:19, Hollink, L. l.holl...@vu.nl wrote:
- Dataset announcement -
We are happy to announce the release of a new linked dataset: the proceedings
of the plenary debates of the European Parliament as Linked Open Data.
The dataset covers all plenary debates held
I think my conclusion from the DOM experience was that actually
people wanted jQuery -- something optimized for the language.
My own RDF APIs have been optimized for js and python respectively,
though they share style and many calls.
See undocumented rdflib.js
On 2013-11 -23, at 12:21, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 23/11/13 17:01, David Booth wrote:
[...]
This would have been fixed if the RDF model had been changed to
represent the language tag as an additional triple, but whether this
would have been a net benefit to the community is still an open
1) I can see Hugh's frustration that the RDF system is incomplete
in a way. You tell everyone you have a model which can
be used for anything and then make something which doesn't use it.
What's wrong with this picture?
Standardising/using/adopting
On 2013-06 -10, at 19:48, Steve Harris wrote:
On 2013-06-09, at 20:36, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
...
- value uknown (it should be there but the source doesn't know it)
Actually that piece of information could be written down in a RDF Schema
graph like this:
It can be written far
On 2013-06 -03, at 22:39, Jan Michelfeit wrote:
Hi,
thank you all for your answers.
... One represents a null by failing to include the relationship
... RDF semantics make no assumptions about what the absence of a
proposition/statement means
I agree. The question was actually about
Check out Jeni Tennison's work on the rest API generator they use for the UK
government data.
Sent from my portable device.
On Apr 16, 2013, at 18:52, Luca Matteis lmatt...@gmail.com wrote:
I have recently created Restpark: http://lmatteis.github.io/restpark/
It's my way of pushing a
Well, the colon should be. No reason why the / should be in this case.
You can't have more than one colon in a URI.
(Though you can in what's typed in a browser bar).
Also, the TAG is going to eliminate the // soon, which will make
everything much simpler.
Tim
(hmmm ...So what would be the
I feel we should be crisp about these things.
Its not a question of thinking of what things kind of tend
to enhance interoperability, it is defining a protocol
which 100% guarantees interoperability.
Here are three distinct protocols which work,
ie guarantee each client can understand each
Interesting to go meta on this with x:preferred .
What would be the meaning of preferred -- preferred by the object itself or
the owner of the object itself?
In other words, I wouldn't use it to store in a local store my preferred names
for people, that would be an abuse of the property.
Tim
Seems to me that the crucial bit of information that the data
which is served by your site now can be got much better by
going th LoC site woul dbe nice to have in machine readable
form.
One idea is *leaving* it in CKAN but mark it
as historical so it can be a place o make the pointer the
the
Nor for me in Massachusetts
On 2012-05 -18, at 12:45, Ivan Herman wrote:
Well... I tried this trick, but does not change a thing. Yes, the search
happens on www.google.com, but I presume it knows that I am, hm, considered
as Dutch and sticks to its guns: I see nothing of the GKG on my
1) The base address used for parsing an RDF document should be the request URI,
not the Content-Location: value. Otherwise randomly clients who can accept
n3 and rdf/xml will get hada.rdf#me and hada.n3#me which is clearly a bad
idea.
(Imagining that there is a hada.n3 option).
Is there is a
Sent from my portable device.
On Apr 3, 2012, at 16:58, Phil Archer ph...@w3.org wrote:
Again, thanks everyone for the quick and useful responses.
@Gannon, @Andy - you are right that the issue of sex/gender is far from
straightforward (they're not even the same thing I've learned!)
PM, Tim Berners-Lee ti...@w3.org wrote:
Jonathan,
I have written the below idea up as a change proposal
http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/ChangeProposal25
The number 25 has no semantics.
Tim
On 2012-03 -25, at 12:35, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
[...] the basic idea of giving a way
http://www.advogato.org/person/timbl/foaf.rdf#me
http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/card#i
http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bookmashup/persons/Tim+Berners-Lee
http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/dblp/resource/person/17
and there is a seeAlso to the machine-editable
On 2012-03 -27, at 16:17, Michael Smethurst wrote:
No sane publisher trying to handle a decent amount of traffic is gonna
follow the dbpedia pattern of doing it in one step (conneg to 303) and
picking up 2 server hits per request. I've said here before that the dbpedia
publishing pattern is
On 2012-03 -26, at 06:18, Leigh Dodds wrote:
I may be misreading you here, but I'm not against unambiguous
definition. My show what is actually broken comment (on twitter) was
essentially the same question as I've asked here before, and as Hugh
asked again recently: what applications
On 2012-03 -25, at 14:06, Norman Gray wrote:
Tim, greetings.
On 2012 Mar 25, at 17:35, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
(Not useful to talk about NIRs. The web architecture does not. Now does
Jonathan's baseline, not HTTP Range-14. Never assume that what an IR is
about is not itself a IR
On 2012-03 -25, at 07:31, Jeni Tennison wrote:
[..]
Yes, as I argued here [3] I strongly believe that casting the separation of
IR and NIR as a best practice rather than a vital necessity is the right way
to go.
Let me assume that you meant:
[..]
Yes, as I argued here [3] I strongly
On 2012-03 -23, at 21:02, Jeni Tennison wrote:
On 23 Mar 2012, at 22:42, Jonathan A Rees wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Jeni Tennison j...@jenitennison.com wrote:
While there are instances of linked data websites using 303 redirections,
there are also many examples of people
Jonathan,
I have written the below idea up as a change proposal
http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/ChangeProposal25
The number 25 has no semantics.
Tim
On 2012-03 -25, at 12:35, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
[...] the basic idea of giving a way of the server making it
explicit that the URI identifies
On 2012-03 -24, at 00:47, Pat Hayes wrote:
I am sympathetic, but...
On Mar 23, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
The proposal is that URI X denotes what the publisher of X says it denotes,
whether it returns 200 or not.
And what if the publisher simply does not say anything
On 2012-03 -25, at 14:39, Noah Mendelsohn wrote:
(commenting now as a technical contributor to the TAG)
On 3/25/2012 5:47 AM, Jeni Tennison wrote:
a 200 response to a probe URI no longer by itself implies that the probe
URI identifies an information resource or that the response is a
On 2012-03 -25, at 16:53, Noah Mendelsohn wrote:
On 3/25/2012 3:37 PM, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
x 303 - y means y is a description of x and therefore y is an
information resource.
My point is: that's a perfectly coherent definition for 303 in principle, but
I don't read RFC 2616
On 2012-03 -22, at 16:21, Jeni Tennison wrote:
[...]
Second, a 200 response to a probe URI no longer implies that the probe URI
identifies an information resource; instead, this can only be inferred if the
probe URI is the object of a ‘describedby’ relationship.
So for any arbitrary web
On 2012-01 -26, at 00:15, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
I see hasColor a lot in the OWL documentation but I was trying to work
out a way to say something has a certain color.
I understand linked open colors was a joke
Anyone know of an ontology with color or hasColor as a predicate?
In
On 2012-01 -04, at 10:42, Yrjana Rankka wrote:
Let's consider this situation:
GRAPH x
s1 p1 val1;
p2 val2;
p3 val3.
GRAPH metadata
x dc:created somedate;
dc:modified someotherdate;
dc:creator Zaphod Beeblebrox.
A client dereferences x
What would you expect to
Frans,
I don't find (as I have said many times before) the term named graph useful,
and this is one example of why. A graph (in N3, say) is a value, like a
string.
Documents, on the other hand, have URIs, and when you look up those
URIs you get back RDF (like turtle) which you can parse to a
Absolutely, Pat. Well said.
This is really important.
Can we please stop the madness of confusing things with documents about them
and do what we want to do cleanly and in an efficient way.
Tim
On 2011-06 -19, at 00:05, Pat Hayes wrote:
Really (sorry to keep raining on the parade, but) it is
On 2011-06 -17, at 08:51, Ian Davis wrote:
If you use HTTP 200 for something different, then
you break my ability to look at a page, review it, and then
express my review in RDF, using the page's URI as the identifier.
Not quite. It is saying that you can't give a review for my
I disagree with this post very strongly, and it is hard to know where to start,
and I am surprised to see it.
On 2011-06 -13, at 07:41, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
On 13 Jun 2011, at 09:59, Christopher Gutteridge wrote:
The real problem seems to me that making resolvable, HTTP URIs for real
Ian,
On 2011-06 -16, at 16:41, Ian Davis wrote:
Tim,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Tim Berners-Lee ti...@w3.org wrote:
I don't think 303 is a quick and dirty hack.
It does mean a large extension of HTTP to be uses with non-documents.
It does have efficiency problems
On 2011-04 -29, at 05:24, Martin Hepp wrote:
Dear all:
Ravensburg in Germany has just turned on the regular publication of complete,
quality-controlled RDF/GoodRelations data about
[..]
For copyright reasons, I cannot attach a map illustrating the enormous data
density, but you can
Nice picture .. don't suppose you have any data at previous times so we can see
the growth?
Tim
On 2011-04 -13, at 07:37, Mischa Tuffield wrote:
Hi All,
I was looking at the number of foaf files on the web over a year ago now,
output looks like so :
Would it be great to have some folks from the LOD community at this
conference to make sure that VIVO interfaces well in with the rest
of the LOD cloud?
Tim
Begin forwarded message:
From: VIVO alici...@ufl.edu
Date: 2011-04-12 8:35:47 EDT
To: timbl+v...@w3.org
Subject: Early Bird
Richard
When you have a triple which is in your linked data set
which includes a URI in another dataset, then that is called a link.
Just as when you have an HTML document which has the URI
of an anchor of another HTML document.
Not sure why you say there is no real linking going on.
You can
Maybe the count of triples should be special-cased in the sparql server code,
spotted on input and the store size returned.
if it is reasonable for the endpoint to keep track of the size of its store.
(Do they anyway?)
Tim
On 2011-03 -05, at 11:58, Bill Roberts wrote:
Thanks Hugh - as someone
On 2011-01 -17, at 16:37, Dave Reynolds wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 16:51 +0100, Martin Hepp wrote:
Dear all:
RFC 2616 [1, section 3.2.3] says that
When comparing two URIs to decide if they match or not, a client
SHOULD use a case-sensitive octet-by-octet comparison of the entire
On 2011-01 -14, at 03:48, Martin Hepp wrote:
Hi John:
IMHO (i) Martin is right regarding the (interpretation of the) definition of
rdfs:seeAlso (ii) Tim is right regarding the practical issues thrown up by
use of the wider interpretation of the range of rdfs:seeAlso.
The question is:
On 2011-01 -13, at 07:23, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Where is the spec for this engineered protocol and where in that spec
does it redefine rdfs:seeAlso?
[I believe I have reasonably decent understanding of, and experience
with, linked data. It is a useful set of conventions and practices
It is well to look at and make best practices for the things
we have if we don't
It was the FOAF folks who, initially, instead of using linked data,
used an Inverse Functional Property to uniquely identify
someone and then rdfs:seeAlso to find the data about them.
So any FOAF browser has to look
I wish the conflation of a VCard and a SocialEntity whose card it is were
either ruled out completely or asserted completely by statements in the
ontology.
I personally find that the class of business card is one which I do not
want to have any data about. (In fact for me it maps best
not to a
On 2010-12 -08, at 04:35, Martin Hepp wrote:
In general, I think that the Semantic Web must use a decentralized approach
for the definition and adoption of conceptual elements, same as the Web uses
decentralized, fault-tolerant approaches as a fundamental principle. So
calling for
Bernard,
You have been tripped up by abuse of content negotiation.
Their document says they do conneg.
cwm http://www.metalex.eu/metalex/1.0
gives you data, as cwm only asks for RDF.
Following it by hand
$ curl -H Accept:application/rdf+xml http://www.metalex.eu/metalex/1.0
!DOCTYPE HTML
Giovani,
When you say the rest of the web, this issue is specifically one
with Facebook Open Graph Protocol, which i a new development.
When you look at the triples
http://inspector.sindice.com/inspect?url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/celebrity/antonio_banderas/#TRIPLES
(Nice view)
the you get
Sorry, this thread has been around but the public-lod list
snuck up on me without my getting on it, so I have missed
some of the fray!
I am happy to look at improvements in the current HTTPRange 14
architecture as I know that 303 is a pain. But I don't want to break the web.
Looking at
Aye, young man we have had linked data about W3C for many years :-)
Point tabulator at http://www.3.org/data#W3C
That wil pull in the organizational structure and the specs:
- domains
- activities
- groups
- deliverables
- documents, versions etc
all
for Executable Open Vocabulary English Q/A
Online at www.reengineeringllc.com
Shared use is free, and there are no advertisements
Adrian Walker
Reengineering
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Tim Berners-Lee ti...@w3.org wrote:
Do I assume that the dog food data does not work in tabulator
because
Do I assume that the dog food data does not work in tabulator
because it the data does conneg and assumes that if you can handle HTML
then you should not be given RDF?
With tabulator,
http://data.semanticweb.org/conference/iswc/2010/ redirects to
On 2009-06 -25, at 13:29, Pat Hayes wrote:
On Jun 25, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote:
Hi all:
After about two months of helping people generate RDF/XML metadata
for their businesses using the GoodRelations annotator [1],
I have quite some evidence that the current best
Agreed. Go for CC0.
Disclaimers are an orthogonal issue I *hope*.
On 2009-06 -08, at 00:13, Marc Wick wrote:
Added some words in the about - any advice as to what the licence
might be?
I guess there is some cc licence that corresponds to:
The information is provided as-is and without any
David,
On 2009-05 -18, at 07:20, David Huynh wrote:
Sherman Monroe wrote:
[...] For example, when I search for Microsoft on Google, the first
result not only IS what I want, but also LOOKs like what I want. I
can make the decision to click on it within maybe 1 or 2 seconds.
The URL
I agree adding more OWN by degrees is a good idea.
But what, John, would you mean by mandate.
Do you mean When I have said something about a class in OWL I'm
happy for your to hold me to it,
or When I have said something about a class in OWL, anyone calling
themselves a Link Data client
On 2008-11 -17, at 11:27, John Goodwin wrote:
[...]
I'd be tempted to generalise or just remove the domain/range
restrictions. Any thoughts?
There are lots of uses for rand and domain.
One is in the user interface -- if you for example link a a person and
a document, the system
can prompt
On 2008-08 -19, at 21:27, David Huynh wrote:
The trouble is of course when the whole web is the database, it's
hard to suggest those relationships (connections) for a set of
entities.
How might one solve that problem? I suppose something like Swoogle
can help. Is that what Tabulator
58 matches
Mail list logo
