Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects

2010-11-17 Thread Kjetil Kjernsmo
On Thursday 11. November 2010 01:50:36 Harry Halpin wrote: > The question is how to build Linked Data on top of only HTTP 200 - > the case where the data publisher either cannot alter their server > set-up (.htaccess) files or does not care to. I think that's really simple, then they should use ha

Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects

2010-11-11 Thread David Wood
On Nov 11, 2010, at 10:05, Nathan wrote: > reality distortion is needed. Heh. +1. Regards, Dave

Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects

2010-11-11 Thread Nathan
Harry Halpin wrote: The question is how to build Linked Data on top of *only* HTTP 200 - the case where the data publisher either cannot alter their server set-up (.htaccess) files or does not care to. (1) use fragments (2) if using slashes, admit "I was wrong" and migrate data (REAL uris do c

Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects

2010-11-11 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 11/11/10 8:07 AM, David Wood wrote: On Nov 11, 2010, at 07:44, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 11/11/10 4:54 AM, Richard Light wrote: In message , Harry Halpin writes The question is how to build Linked Data on top of *only* HTTP 200 - the case where the data publisher either cannot alter th

Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects

2010-11-11 Thread David Wood
On Nov 11, 2010, at 07:44, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 11/11/10 4:54 AM, Richard Light wrote: >> >> In message , >> Harry Halpin writes >>> >>> The question is how to build Linked Data on top of *only* HTTP 200 - >>> the case where the data publisher either cannot alter their server >>> se

Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects

2010-11-11 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 11/11/10 4:54 AM, Richard Light wrote: In message , Harry Halpin writes The question is how to build Linked Data on top of *only* HTTP 200 - the case where the data publisher either cannot alter their server set-up (.htaccess) files or does not care to. Might it help to look at this prob

Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects

2010-11-11 Thread Richard Light
In message , Harry Halpin writes The question is how to build Linked Data on top of *only* HTTP 200 - the case where the data publisher either cannot alter their server set-up (.htaccess) files or does not care to. Might it help to look at this problem from the other end of the telescope? S

Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects

2010-11-10 Thread Harry Halpin
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:15 PM, David Wood wrote: > Hi all, > > I've collected my thoughts on The Great 303 Debate of 2010 (as it will be > remembered) at: >  http://prototypo.blogspot.com/2010/11/another-guide-to-publishing-linked-data.html > > Briefly, I propose a new HTTP status code (210 De

Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects

2010-11-10 Thread David Wood
Hi Harry, On Nov 10, 2010, at 19:50, Harry Halpin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:15 PM, David Wood wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've collected my thoughts on The Great 303 Debate of 2010 (as it will be >> remembered) at: >> >> http://prototypo.blogspot.com/2010/11/another-guide-to-publishing

Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects

2010-11-10 Thread Giovanni Tummarello
Bravo Harry :-) let me also add without adding anythng to the header.. *keeping HTTP completely outside the picture* http header are for pure optimization issues, almos networking level. Caching fetching crawling, nothing to do with semantics. A conjecture: the right howto document is about 2 pa

Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects

2010-11-10 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 11/10/10 5:15 PM, David Wood wrote: Hi all, I've collected my thoughts on The Great 303 Debate of 2010 (as it will be remembered) at: http://prototypo.blogspot.com/2010/11/another-guide-to-publishing-linked-data.html Briefly, I propose a new HTTP status code (210 Description Found) to

A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects

2010-11-10 Thread David Wood
Hi all, I've collected my thoughts on The Great 303 Debate of 2010 (as it will be remembered) at: http://prototypo.blogspot.com/2010/11/another-guide-to-publishing-linked-data.html Briefly, I propose a new HTTP status code (210 Description Found) to disambiguate between generic information r

Re: Publishing Linked Data without Redirects

2010-11-08 Thread Ian Davis
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Phil Archer wrote: > On the face of it, this first rule applies to the toucan example since the > content-location header is not mentioned at all. This seems very odd - > surely for rule 4 /ever/ to match it must be applied ahead of what is now > rule 1? What am I

Re: Publishing Linked Data without Redirects

2010-11-08 Thread Phil Archer
This makes a lot of sense and I'm feeling a lot more comfortable. Thanks Ian. However, like kaeic, who commented on the blog, I have one little concern that I hope can be made to go away. The list of rules to apply take a first match and the one we're interested in is no. 4. However, doesn't

Publishing Linked Data without Redirects

2010-11-08 Thread Ian Davis
I wrote up a summary of the current thinking on using 200 instead of 303 to serve up Linked Data: http://iand.posterous.com/a-guide-to-publishing-linked-data-without-red The key part is: When your webserver receives a GET request to your thing’s URI you may respond with a 200 response code and i