Hi Guys,
I am puzzled by the whole discussion, so will try to summarise to find out
if I have some misunderstanding.
It really is just about finding where the URIs are, and search engines are
the game in town. We need to make it really easy for people to find the
Linked Data URIs they need.
Guys,
the Web of Data cannot rely on mass data crawling of the whole Web but
must combine cached data with federated on-demand queries. Structured
data requires much faster update cycles than typical text-based Web
indices. For example, Google and Yahoo can rely on the fact that
I'd say, if i understand well
that that works only for queries where you need the extra dereferenced
data just additionally e.g. to add a label to your result se
if you need the remote, on the fly reference data to e.g. sort by
price you'd have to fetch all from the remote site ..
Gio
On Sun,
I agree wihtt this, a combination of the 2, without into unrealistic
services descriptions, is exactly its the question.
its great to be talking about this.
I'd be gladly have a chat about all this at ISWC for those who are there?
Cheers
Giovanni
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Martin Hepp
A) The wrapper's Semantic Sitemap points you at the original Sitemap, and
says how it is doing the wrapping. And because you know how the wrapper is
behaving, you can process the standard Sitemap to get the information you
want about what the wrapping site provides.
Actually, the slicing in
The SWCL-style approach works pretty well as long as the RDF you want about
the URIs is the stuff you get by resolving.
It can be much more problematic if the URI is in some site such as (a
wrapped) Amazon, saying what is the price of a book identified by a
publisher's URI.
There are ways round
On Sunday 18 October 2009 17:50:58 Hugh Glaser wrote:
The SWCL-style approach works pretty well as long as the RDF you want about
the URIs is the stuff you get by resolving.
Right, that's the fundamental assumption. And that's what Linked Data is
about. ;-)
It can be much more problematic if
On 18/10/2009 17:12, Olaf Hartig har...@informatik.hu-berlin.de wrote:
On Sunday 18 October 2009 17:50:58 Hugh Glaser wrote:
The SWCL-style approach works pretty well as long as the RDF you want about
the URIs is the stuff you get by resolving.
Right, that's the fundamental assumption.
Olaf Hartig wrote:
Hey,
On Sunday 18 October 2009 09:37:14 Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote:
[...]
So it will boil down to technology that combines (1) crawling and
caching rather stable data sets with (2) distributing queries and parts
of queries among the right SPARQL endpoints (whatever actual
Hugh Glaser wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am puzzled by the whole discussion, so will try to summarise to find out
if I have some misunderstanding.
It really is just about finding where the URIs are, and search engines are
the game in town. We need to make it really easy for people to find the
Linked Data
Frederick Giasson wrote:
Hi all,
The Web of Linked
Data shouldn't be about mass crawling (search engine style)
etc...
It has to be. How would you answer a query like all offers for a book
written by a German author without crawling the relevant data sets?
First question would be:
Does Sindice crawl this (or any other semantic web search engines)?
Juan Sequeda, Ph.D Student
Dept. of Computer Sciences
The University of Texas at Austin
www.juansequeda.com
www.semanticwebaustin.org
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Martin Hepp (UniBW)
h...@ebusiness-unibw.org wrote:
Dear
Juan Sequeda wrote:
Does Sindice crawl this (or any other semantic web search engines)?
Juan,
Sponger is not about Sindice crawling our proxy URIs. The Web of Linked
Data shouldn't be about mass crawling (search engine style) etc... Its
really supposed to be about smarter data network
...@ebusiness-unibw.org; public-lod@w3.org
Subject: Re: The Power of Virtuoso Sponger Technology
Juan Sequeda wrote:
Does Sindice crawl this (or any other semantic web search engines)?
Juan,
Sponger is not about Sindice crawling our proxy URIs. The Web of Linked
Data shouldn't be about
: Saturday, October 17, 2009 4:58 PM
To: Juan Sequeda
Cc: h...@ebusiness-unibw.org; public-lod@w3.org
Subject: Re: The Power of Virtuoso Sponger Technology
Juan Sequeda wrote:
Does Sindice crawl this (or any other semantic web search engines)?
Juan,
Sponger is not about Sindice crawling our
: Saturday, October 17, 2009 4:58 PM
To: Juan Sequeda
Cc: h...@ebusiness-unibw.org mailto:h...@ebusiness-unibw.org;
public-lod@w3.org mailto:public-lod@w3.org
Subject: Re: The Power of Virtuoso Sponger Technology
Juan Sequeda wrote:
Does Sindice crawl this (or any
Hi all,
The Web of Linked
Data shouldn't be about mass crawling (search engine style) etc...
It has to be. How would you answer a query like all offers for a book
written by a German author without crawling the relevant data sets?
First question would be: which dataset has this
With respect to crawling and scraping or sponging or .. trying to
guess based on partial fragments of structured information i can say
3 thngs
a) No, we're not doing it at the moment, we are only covering those
who chose to put structured semantics. Some book stuff shows up in
Sig.ma .. e.g.
Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
With respect to crawling and scraping or sponging or .. trying to
guess based on partial fragments of structured information i can say
3 thngs
a) No, we're not doing it at the moment, we are only covering those
who chose to put structured semantics. Some book stuff
19 matches
Mail list logo
