Re: recording meetings

2011-12-23 Thread Sandro Hawke
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 20:18 +, Paola Di Maio wrote: > A few quick follow up thoughts about this recording thing > > (the transcripts are v useful to catch up and document what was said, > but a bit difficult and long to read. Recordings do have an important > place for ppl who cannot attend t

Re: recording meetings

2011-12-23 Thread Paola Di Maio
A few quick follow up thoughts about this recording thing (the transcripts are v useful to catch up and document what was said, but a bit difficult and long to read. Recordings do have an important place for ppl who cannot attend the meetings) a few other possibilities to explore: - is there an

Re: recording meetings

2011-12-22 Thread Paola Di Maio
Take this opportunity to apologise for missing the last meeting (belated) I was travelling Sounds like there may be a new requirement for recording software feature: when the caller dials the call, should be asked to give consent to record, if this is not given, they should be able to participate

Re: recording meetings

2011-12-20 Thread Bernadette Hyland
ly), or some other reason? >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Dave McAllister [mailto:dmcal...@adobe.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:51 PM >> To: Sandro Hawke; Holm, Jeanne M (1760) >> Cc: Nikos Roussos; W3C eGov IG mailing list; Linked Data com

RE: recording meetings

2011-12-20 Thread Brand Niemann
-Original Message- >From: Dave McAllister [mailto:dmcal...@adobe.com] >Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:51 PM >To: Sandro Hawke; Holm, Jeanne M (1760) >Cc: Nikos Roussos; W3C eGov IG mailing list; Linked Data community >Subject: Re: recording meetings > >However, it is

RE: recording meetings

2011-12-20 Thread Brand Niemann
Thank you. -Original Message- From: John Erickson [mailto:olyerick...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 1:36 PM To: Brand Niemann Cc: Dave McAllister; Sandro Hawke; Holm, Jeanne M (1760); Nikos Roussos; W3C eGov IG mailing list; Linked Data community Subject: Re: recording

Re: recording meetings

2011-12-20 Thread Dave McAllister
r [mailto:dmcal...@adobe.com] >Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:51 PM >To: Sandro Hawke; Holm, Jeanne M (1760) >Cc: Nikos Roussos; W3C eGov IG mailing list; Linked Data community >Subject: Re: recording meetings > >However, it is possible to record just the presentation portion, &g

Re: recording meetings

2011-12-20 Thread John Erickson
Brand Niemann asks: > Interesting discussion - Are we having these presentations because there is > consideration being given to licensing LOD to protect it (from what), allow > someone to make money off of it (really), or some other reason? I think it's more fundamental than that; the eGov commu

RE: recording meetings

2011-12-20 Thread Brand Niemann
] Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:51 PM To: Sandro Hawke; Holm, Jeanne M (1760) Cc: Nikos Roussos; W3C eGov IG mailing list; Linked Data community Subject: Re: recording meetings However, it is possible to record just the presentation portion, especially if using internet meeting software. Since

Re: recording meetings

2011-12-20 Thread Sandro Hawke
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 09:51 -0800, Dave McAllister wrote: > However, it is possible to record just the presentation portion, > especially if using internet meeting software. Since I'm only recording > the presenter (and potentially other named speakers), and a moderator, it > is easier to gain per

Re: recording meetings

2011-12-20 Thread Dave McAllister
However, it is possible to record just the presentation portion, especially if using internet meeting software. Since I'm only recording the presenter (and potentially other named speakers), and a moderator, it is easier to gain permission. If it's just an audio stream though, it's probably not w

recording meetings

2011-12-20 Thread Sandro Hawke
On Tue, 2011-12-20 at 07:52 -0800, Holm, Jeanne M (1760) wrote: > Nikos-- > > > I'm not sure we'll be doing an audio recording, but let me checkā€¦ As I understand it, the laws around audio recording make it too risky. In particular, in some jurisdictions, including Massachusetts where our phone b