Re: [rdf] Re: URIs

2006-06-18 Thread John Madden
Alan et al, Wow, great topic. I'll need to get my thoughts together on this. Meanwhile, operationally what a uri "means" is clearly related to the question of its (non)persistence. I recently found a wonderful historical review of this topic from the point of view of a library scientist.

Re: [rdf] Re: URIs

2006-06-18 Thread Alan Ruttenberg
[It was on this list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- semweb-lifesci/2006Jun/0149] -Alan' On Jun 18, 2006, at 12:20 PM, John Madden wrote: I can't locate the beginning of this thread. Did the discussion start on another list? Thanks. John On Jun 17, 2006, at 1708, Eric Neuman

Re: [rdf] Re: URIs

2006-06-18 Thread John Madden
I can't locate the beginning of this thread. Did the discussion start on another list? Thanks. John On Jun 17, 2006, at 1708, Eric Neumann wrote: This is a very useful and important discussion thread, and I would like to see others on the list to contribute their thoughts/ concerns as

Re: [rdf] Re: URIs

2006-06-18 Thread Sean Martin
Eric Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/17/2006 12:33:25 PM: > May I ask all the contributors to include HTML links to any acronyms > they reference (e.g., NAPTR)? This will make it easier for the rest of > us to catch up quickly, and to eventually collect the approaches out > there into