New HCLSIG Activities Calendar

Folks, Since so many activities are progressing, many which have conference calls and minutes, I thought we could use a simple calendar page to list events in chronological order: http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG/Activities_Calendar Coordinators, please try and update your planned conferen

Minutes of July 20 HCLS Conf Call

Planned July 20 HCLSig Teleconference Agenda:Time: 11:00 am EDT July 20, 2006 in America/New York for a duration of 1hourPhone: tel:+1-617-761-6200 (Zakim) conference #4257 (HCLS)irc://irc.w3.org:6665/hclsChairs: Eric Neumann, Tonya HongsermeierAgenda:a) Convene, take roll, review recordb) Propose

RE: BioRDF: URI Best Practices

Matthias, > The motivation for my proposal was that I think it is better > to know which URIs are supposed to be resolvable before we > are actually trying a HTTP GET or try to resolve something > with the LSID system. In large datasets we have plenty of > URIs -- if every agent would try to

RE: BioRDF: URI Best Practices

On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:48:56 -0400, Xiaoshu Wang wrote: > What you said is not correct that "When RDF was invented it was > mostly intended to be used with URLs of the second group", Tim > Bernerds-Lee has long envisioned that URI is for everything. Agreed, however I have observed that the emphas

RE: [HCLS-ACPP] July 18 Tcon Minutes and "use of rules with ontology in semantic web" tutorial session in next Tcon on July 25

Hi, Vipul Thanks so much for your paper.  It provides an ideal test case for ACPP to work on :)  I will try to apply our ACPP ontology and develop some rules accordingly to see if our proposed ACPP ontology is adequate to represent the knowledge outlined in your paper. You are welcome to join o

RE: BioRDF: URI Best Practices

Matthias, > On the page > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/URI_Best_ > Practices/Use_Cases > I have written that an "ontology of resolvable resources" > would be practical in some cases. If you read "the Architecture of World Wide Web http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/";, you wou

Success stories?

Hi Everyone, Does anyone out there have (yet) a success story they can point me to or tell me about where there's been a "ROI" return using RDF/ OWLSemantic Technologies have had a bit of a cult following in life sciences for a while, and one can find the occasional success story (like th

Re: [HCLS-ACPP] July 18 Tcon Minutes and "use of rules with ontology in semantic web" tutorial session in next Tcon on July 25

Helen -- In this connection, you may be interested in the examples listed below, and also in the online system at the same site that runs them.  There is also a paper listed. HTH,   -- Adrian http://www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/GeneSequenceOntology3.agent http://www.reengineeringllc.c

[HCLS-ACPP] July 18 Tcon Minutes and "use of rules with ontology in semantic web" tutorial session in next Tcon on July 25

Dear All Here is the minutes of our Tcon on July 18 http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/ACPPTaskForce/Telecons/july18_2006 At ACPP, we recognize the need to use rules when representing medical and operational knowledge in adaptable clinical protocols and pathways.  Not all facts and relationship can b

Re: BioRDF: URI Best Practices

On the page http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/URI_Best_Practices/Use_Cases I have written that an "ontology of resolvable resources" would be practical in some cases. I have created such a small ontology, it can be downloaded / imported from http://neuroscientific.net/ont/reso

Re: BioRDF: URI Best Practices

hi Susie, Is there any chance that we can have a section that details the pro's and con's of URL's as URIs in a Life Sciences setting.  It is my understanding that the LSID URN was created in response to certain short comings of URLs  as names  - but may well not have over come them and so the var