I had been using FOAF as a basis and then adding relations as needed.
-Alan
On Sep 12, 2006, at 10:52 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
Dear all,
we would need some feedback...
There were some brainstorming on what vocabularies to use for the
simple
notion of 'Person' in various settings. There is ol
It's probably quite important to define various relation classes for the aggregated properties we tend to relate to a person. I would imagine this comes under standard upper ontologies. It would necessarily need to include definitions of FOAF and vCard so that we could classify across current data
In developing SPE ontology, I have tried to re-use FOAF and vCard, but
unfortunately found little can can be re-used. One main reason is that,
although they may have the terms, the definitions of these terms
usually don't match what's required by the Person class in SPE
ontology. The problem mostly
Hi Ivan et al.,
Based on my limited experience, a person in the life science and
healthcare context can be considered as a subject or patient (which can
be a subclass of person). Of course, there are other roles a person can
play (e.g., doctors, researchers, and authors). For genetic studies,
ACPP Tcon today:
3:00pm-4:00pmEDT/19:00-20:00
UTC
Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 2277 ("ACPP")
Agenda:
- Use of Rules in ACPP
- Cardiothoracic usecase(from
Chimezie)
- Discussion on Healthcare
Domain Ontology
Helen
We use (or at least plan to map our ontology to) FOAF, primarily
because of its linkage to Wordnet, support for identity reasoning (via
Inverse Function Properties), significant adoption, and coverage of a good
chunk of vocabulary terms that can be used for patient demographic data.
We do al
Dear all,
we would need some feedback...
There were some brainstorming on what vocabularies to use for the simple
notion of 'Person' in various settings. There is old W3C note for an RDF
version of vCard[1], but another version was created by Norm Walsh a
while ago[2]. And, of course, there is FO
Robert.
00:24 12/09/2006, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
On Sep 10, 2006, at 8:21 AM, Marco Brandizi wrote:
- ...how much are RDF and OWL scalable? Let's take a small data set
of 100 microarray experiments, with 10k probe sets x 10
hybridiazations. We would have (at least) 10 millions numbers to
han
