RE: [BioRDF] Taxonomic Databases Working Group and LSIDs

2006-09-27 Thread Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
[Delayed follow-up] Donald, Thanks for your thoughtful responses. More comments/questions below. > From: Donald Hobern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] . . . > Probably the greatest concern with the approach you describe is a > sociological one. If we adopt any system consisting simply of HTTP >

BioRDF call 9/25 minutes

2006-09-27 Thread Marja Koivunen
The minutes from BioRDF call 9/25 are available at: http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Meetings/2006-09-25_Conference_Call Marja

Re: CAP use case - Reasoning on Weighted Condition and Fuzzy Reasoning?

2006-09-27 Thread helen . chen
Hi, Scott Good point.  Here are more details about the "weighted conditions" in the same use case. In the CAP guideline [1], the following table is presented to present the various factors of these signs: Multivariate Predictors of Pneumonia, with logistic Coefficient, Odds Ratios, and 95% CIs

Semweb-lifesci reasoning requirement

2006-09-27 Thread Adrian Walker
Hi Helen -- I noticed your requirement ... Now we are facing the new problem of modelling "two or more" facts of a necessary condition for "order chest X-ray" in the knowledge base.  Furthermore, doctors will likely tell you that no only they need to express "at least two or more", they also

Fw: CAP use case - Reasoning on Weighted Condition and Fuzzy Reasoning?

2006-09-27 Thread helen . chen
Hi, Vipul Thanks for your "workaround" information. This is the email I received earlier from Samson. Great minds indeed come to the same place :) Jos had implemented a similar solution.  One step further, you can have a triple to specify the N in the statement of (at least N out of M signs) s

Re: CAP use case - Reasoning on Weighted Condition and Fuzzy Reasoning?

2006-09-27 Thread M. Scott Marshall
Nice workaround, Vipul. I have to agree with you that it has a few problems. As you pointed out, it doesn't scale well. Another problem is that the "black & white" view provided by so-called crisp logic of DL is insufficient to represent or reason with all the knowledge available to us and ca

RE: CAP use case - Reasoning on Weighted Condition and Fuzzy Reasoning?

2006-09-27 Thread Chimezie Ogbuji
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Kashyap, Vipul wrote: 1. Lack of explanation capabilities: A key feature for clinical decision support is that physicians like to get explanations for the recommendations proposed by the system. Well, I'd argue that the recommendations are the accompanying literature

RE: CAP use case - Reasoning on Weighted Condition and Fuzzy Reasoning?

2006-09-27 Thread helen . chen
Hi, Vipul Strongly agreed with two points you made here.   The problem, however, is first on the modelling side of such "weighted conditions".  In the example, > 3: "Obtain chest X-ray, especially if patient has two or more of these > signs: >   Temp > 100F >   Pulse > 100 >   Decreased breath