For the next few weeks, while we are focusing on finalizing the use
cases, we are going to be holding joint BIONT/BioRDF calls. The first of
these calls will be held during the BioRDF time slot on Monday.
Kind regards,
Vipul and Susie
Date of Call: Monday February 5, 2007
Time of Call: 11:
> - If the server replies 303 See Other, follow the link in the
> response to get information about resource. [obscure hack but worth
> a try]
> (see http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#httpRange-14)
I guess we should find a diplomatic formulation for that.
> - Disadvantage: you need an O
- Mint URL's whose hostname specifies a long-lived server that will
maintain the resource at the given URL in perpetuity.
(Publishers,
libraries, and universities are in good positions to do this.)
[good as for as it goes, but user may not be in control, or may
find quality
> From: Xiaoshu Wang
>
> > From: David Booth
> > . . .
> > My overall comment: Yes! I believe a URI resolution ontology could
> > significantly help address these problems, while still
> > permitting URIs
> > to be based on the http scheme, thus facilitating bootstrapping and
> > minimizing ba
My overall comment: Yes! I believe a URI resolution ontology could
significantly help address these problems, while still permitting URIs
to be based on the http scheme, thus facilitating bootstrapping and
minimizing barriers to adoption.
I am very doubtful about the practicality of such an
