On Feb 2, 2007, at 10:24 AM, Xiaoshu Wang wrote:
I am very doubtful about the practicality of such an ontology.
First, consider the size. RDF is all about URI. If an RDF
document has n statement, there will be 3n URIs. If k statements
are needed to describe the resolution of one URI, th
On Feb 3, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Xiaoshu Wang wrote:
Also, I found this sentence in the example of the problem statement
"...How to make the user's application work without having to
rewrite the RDF? "
You still need to rewrite the RDF even if you have a resolution
ontology, am I right?
No, you
Please accept our apologies if you receive multiple copies of this message.
--
1st International Workshop on Web Service Composition and Adaptation
(WSCA-2007)
http://www.cild.iastate.edu/wsca
Affiliated with 5th IEEE Inte
Matthias Samwald wrote:
> - If the server replies 303 See Other, follow the link in the
> response to get information about resource. [obscure hack but worth
> a try]
> (see http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#httpRange-14)
I guess we should find a diplomatic formulation for that.
