2007 Protege Conference: Schedule & Early Registration

Protege Community, The full schedule for the 10th International Protege Conference is now available on the conference website: http://protege.stanford.edu/conference/2007/schedule.html Please note that the early registration deadline is next Friday, June 1st. We encourage those of you who h

Re: Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web

On May 20, 2007, at 11:49 PM, Alan Rector wrote: Chris On 18 May 2007, at 18:10, Chris Mungall wrote: I'm afraid I'm unclear how to state the OWL n-ary relation pattern(http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations) where I really need it. In all the examples given, the "lifted"[*] n-ary re

Re: Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web

On May 21, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Pat Hayes wrote: > "CM" == Chris Mungall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Out of curiosity, can you describe how different or similar this >> is to the result that you can achieve in the N-ary relation >> design pattern for OWL? >> >> Obviously, b

Re: Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web

On May 21, 2007, at 11:24 AM, Pat Hayes wrote: > "CM" == Chris Mungall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Out of curiosity, can you describe how different or similar this >> is to the result that you can achieve in the N-ary relation >> design pattern for OWL? >> >> Obviously, b

Re: Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web

On May 20, 2007, at 11:49 PM, Alan Rector wrote: Chris On 18 May 2007, at 18:10, Chris Mungall wrote: I'm afraid I'm unclear how to state the OWL n-ary relation pattern (http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations) where I really need it. In all the examples given, the "lifted"[*] n-ary

Re: Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web

> "CM" == Chris Mungall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Out of curiosity, can you describe how different or similar this >> is to the result that you can achieve in the N-ary relation >> design pattern for OWL? >> >> Obviously, building things into the DL is nice, but it's not

Re: Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web

Chris On 18 May 2007, at 18:10, Chris Mungall wrote: I'm afraid I'm unclear how to state the OWL n-ary relation pattern(http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations) where I really need it. In all the examples given, the "lifted"[*] n-ary relation was never truly a relation in the first plac

Re: Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web

> "CM" == Chris Mungall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Out of curiosity, can you describe how different or similar this >> is to the result that you can achieve in the N-ary relation >> design pattern for OWL? >> >> Obviously, building things into the DL is nice, but it's not >

Re: Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web

Sorry for the delay in replying -- been busy! I can see your point that the design pattern gets more complex when you move to 3 or 4 n-ary relationships. It would be good to have a representation of for n-ary's which is also represented in the logic as opposed to layered on top. Phil >

Re: [wbs] response to '2007 Technical Plenary/AC Meetings Week Logistics for the Group Meetings (for Chairs)'

I attempted to document our best guess plan to the W3C administration so we could have a slot at the Technical Plenary meeting 5-11 November 2007. This assumes that we extend our charter. Here are my assumptions: 15 people from HCLS would be at the face to face meeting 8-11 Nov. 10 of them wou

Re: Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web

Bijan Parsia wrote: On May 16, 2007, at 11:15 AM, Phillip Lord wrote: "EJ" == Eric Jain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: EJ> Just catching up on reading papers :-) EJ> EJ> "It is also useful to know who believes something and EJ> why.

reminder: May 22 semantic web SIG meeting in silicon valley

Just a reminder: Semantic web SIG in silicon valley will have a special event on this Tuesday evening. It's co-located with the Semantic Tech Conference. So, if you come to the conference, you may want to check out the panel discussion we put together: "Web 3.0 Semantics? Silicon Valley Meets th