On Oct 11, 2007, at 4:19 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
URI1 the first URI
endpthe http endpoint identified by URI1
URI2 the URI to which endp redirects URI1
redir the http endpoint identified by URI2
potato the potato which (we all know) URI refers to
Then the following should hold, according
I wish I could not worry. Pat has put me at ease, so I've added his
idea as a 5th option. But your implicit question is why do I care. The
reason is that I want to win over various ornery parties to the
application of the http: scheme to the semantic web, if it makes
sense, or abandon it, if not.
As usual, I like your explanation very much. It borders on sophistry,
but that doesn't bother me much, or won't until my next conversation
with someone who's upset about the use of http: URIs to refer to
things that aren't network resources.
I've copied your email to the wiki page, reformatted a
I have to agree that almost all the semantic websites I've seen,
with huge list of triples, look at best discouraging, at worst
impenetrable.
You might find COE, our graphic ontology viewer/editor, useful. It
displays RDF/RDFS/OWL as concept maps, lets you edit the Cmap and
then outputs leg
It could of course do this itself were it not for the unfortunate
fact that, because of http-range-14, this would probably confuse
you into thinking that it actually was the potato.
Actually it wouldn't confuse you, of course. But it might confuse
some poor dumb SemWeb reasoning engine.
For URI fanatics only...
For the purposes of my URI project I wanted to know just what IANA had
to say about the use of http: URIs, so I did some poking around. I
report (neutrally, I hope) on what I found here:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/URI_Best_Practices/Recommenda
Jonathan Rees wrote:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/URI_Best_Practices/Recommendations/StatusOfHttpScheme
4 :-)
For URI fanatics only...
For the purposes of my URI project I wanted to know just what IANA had
to say about the use of http: URIs, so I did some poking around. I
report (neutrally, I hope) on what I found here:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/URI_Best_Practices/Recommendati
Here's the reminder for Monday's BioRDF call.
Cheers,
Susie
== Conference Details ==
* Date of Call: Monday October 15, 2007
* Time of Call: 11:00am Eastern Time
* Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
* Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
* Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Brist
Hi all,
Matthias is being very nice here :-)
All i can say about DERI is that we do at this time have a strong will and
"capacity" to invest in this area of studies. As such we're are really
looking forward to receive and evaluate proposals for individuals interested
in helping us understand how t
That's great Matthias-- I hope we can use this to get European researchers to
help contribute on both content and query examples.
Is there a distribution network in palce for any HCLS demo additions made by
contributors, so that all the sites would have access to the code?
Eric
-Origina
Wonderful. Great job everyone. :-)
Susie
On 10/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The Health Care and Life Science demo that has been presented at the WWW
> conference in Banff earlier this year is now also hosted on a dedicated
> server at DERI, Galway [1].
>
> You can t
I have to agree that almost all the semantic websites I've seen, with
huge list of triples, look at best discouraging, at worst impenetrable.
But for a core set of lenses you require some standard, no ?
Do you have some specific use-cases to begin with ?
best,
Andrea
Il giorno 11/ott/07, alle
The Health Care and Life Science demo that has been presented at the WWW
conference in Banff earlier this year is now also hosted on a dedicated server
at DERI, Galway [1].
You can try it out here:
http://hcls.deri.ie/hcls_demo.html
DERI has great expertise in the field of Semantic Web technol
14 matches
Mail list logo
