Did you go through the application for access to get this
information? Looks like the terms of use would prohibit our
publishing any of the content in a demo. Is that your read too?
-Alan
On Oct 5, 2007, at 4:22 AM, Matt Williams wrote:
Dear All,
This is to try an sketch the outlines of
I've updated the draft data flow diagram for creating the PubMeSH graph.
So far I haven't shortened the URIs but everything else should be correct.
Please let me know if it isn't.
Draft found at:
http://www.brainstage.com/CreateMedlineTriples.jpg
Thank you,
Don
--
Donald Doherty, Ph.D.
Brains
I've started a page to explain the Banff 2007 Demo SPARQL query that asks
"Can we find candidate genes known to be involved in signal transduction and
active in pyramidal neurons?"
This is a very rough draft and my explanation breaks down at points. I'm
counting on you SPARQL / OWL / RDF expert
Jonathan Rees wrote:
This isn't academic. The Library of Congress trashes the http: scheme
[1] in the same way that the LSID spec does - they say it's no good
because URIs are locators (first answer) instead of "identifiers"
(references; second answer). The justification for using http: for
lite
