Hi All,
The demo is online at:
http://responder.ruleml.org
The slides about Prova are online at:
http://ibis.in.tum.de/projects/paw/docs/HCLS_2007.pdf
Best regards,
Adrian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Susie M
Stephens
Ge
Vipul and all
Rachel and I started to work on a very rough draft of CT Eligibility
ontology. This is only a beginning and provides a starting point for some
discussion. We looked at the eligibility listed in the sample trials
outlined in Rachel's use cases. We can refine the ontology accordi
Hi,
I will be presenting HCLS examples/use cases related to uncertainty to the
Uncertainty Reasoning Working Group
On Wednesday, October 17th from 9:30am - 11:00am.
The current wiki page is at: http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/UncertaintyUseCases
Please feel free to add and annotate to the
Ah, OK. This requires a login, but the terms of use seem better.
Perhaps what these searches produce might be worth translating into
RDF...
At least doing that might gain some some interest from the LONI folks
to permit a bit more to be let out.
-Alan
On Oct 15, 2007, at 7:17 AM, Matt Wi
I went to:
https://services.loni.ucla.edu/ida/archive?SubMode=GotoSearch
and did a set of searches, then looked at the fields they used;
Many of the fields are described, but not used (i.e. there are no
instances which have some data in these fields).
Doing this shows that the vast majority
Ok. From which document did you get the information about the
particulars of the schema you mention?
-Alan
On Oct 15, 2007, at 4:27 AM, Matt Williams wrote:
No, I didn't - chasing down images themselves seems prohibitive at
this time, given constraints.
I would agree with your reading of
Dear All,
Have just realised the time of this call (in UK terms) which clashes
with me picking up the kids.
Sorry.
I will summarise those things I have anything to say anything about in
advance, and comment on the minutes (assuming they're on the wiki).
Apologies,
Matt
Susie M Stephens w
No, I didn't - chasing down images themselves seems prohibitive at this
time, given constraints.
I would agree with your reading of the terms of use.
Matt
Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
Did you go through the application for access to get this information?
Looks like the terms of use would prohibit
