Re: GO as RDF properties

2008-03-13 Thread Pat Hayes
At 9:53 AM +0900 3/14/08, Tore Eriksson wrote: Hi again Chris, sorry for splitting up my answers. You could define your own property and link it to the GO class via an  annotation property. Here you're just using GO as fancy  documentation. This approach would probably be the most in keepin

Re: GO as RDF properties

2008-03-13 Thread Tore Eriksson
Hi again Chris, sorry for splitting up my answers. > You could define your own property and link it to the GO class via an > annotation property. Here you're just using GO as fancy > documentation. This approach would probably be the most in keeping > with the BioPAX-y OO type approach abov

Re: GO as RDF properties

2008-03-13 Thread Tore Eriksson
Hi Talapady, > Why not use EC number to denote enzyme and use GO as an alias? EC numbers > are far more popular and more universily known to other databases for > exchange of information. This is for internal use, and I am using GO in my databases here. > Also why not use thermodynamics data

Re: GO as RDF properties

2008-03-13 Thread Talapady Bhat
Hi, Why not use EC number to denote enzyme and use GO as an alias? EC numbers are far more popular and more universily known to other databases for exchange of information. Also why not use thermodynamics data as well ? Thanks T N Bhat - Original Message - From: "Tore Eriksson"

Re: GO as RDF properties

2008-03-13 Thread Tore Eriksson
Hi Chris, > As Alan says biopax-obo would be a good list to ask about this I'm checking out the list at this very moment. > > Also, I suppose I have to remap the > > class hierarchy to a property hierarchy, since the properties will not > > heed the rdfs:subClassOf hierarchy. Perhaps something

Re: GO as RDF properties

2008-03-13 Thread Chris Mungall
On Mar 12, 2008, at 9:06 PM, Tore Eriksson wrote: Hi, I am contemplating how to represent biochemical reactions in RDF, and I have some questions about properties and subproperties that I hope anyone could shed some light on. What I want to do is to model reactions and the involved ent

Re: GO as RDF properties

2008-03-13 Thread Alan Ruttenberg
Hello Tore, You might consider posing this question to the obo-discuss group, where discussion of the use of GO often occurs, or consider joining the biopax-obo effort - http://groups.google.com/group/biopax-obo - where we are currently working on precisely this sort of problem - represe

GO as RDF properties

2008-03-13 Thread Tore Eriksson
Hi, I am contemplating how to represent biochemical reactions in RDF, and I have some questions about properties and subproperties that I hope anyone could shed some light on. What I want to do is to model reactions and the involved entities like this: _:bn1 a :Reaction; :substrate ; :s