What about DBpedia (http://dbpedia.org)?
-Kei
Dan Brickley wrote:
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/80128,wikipedia-hosts-human-gene-repository.aspx
[[
U.S. scientists are developing a “Gene Wiki” with the aim of fostering
a flexible, organic archive of human genetic information.
The proje
On Thursday 10 July 2008, "Matthias Samwald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A slight shift in topic: I wonder how secure such specialised types
> of wiki content are from vandalisaton or errors introduced by
> improper use. Generally, wikis can counter such threats through the
> power of the 'thousa
A slight shift in topic: I wonder how secure such specialised types of wiki
content are from vandalisaton or errors introduced by improper use.
Generally, wikis can counter such threats through the power of the 'thousand
eyes' of the readers, who can quickly jump in and correct obvious errors.
Take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITK_%28gene%29. It's
actually mostly highly structured text, with numerous stable
publication identifiers (DOIs and PubMed ids). OK, so it's not marked
up in RDF/XML, etc., but in order to exploit the long tail you
actually have to have a tail i
On Thursday 10 July 2008, Roderic Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, they do mention http://www.wikiprofessional.org/portal/ as
> a note added in proof, and I think the main point of their paper
> was the ability to make use of the large, already existing community
> that edits Wikipedi
Actually, they do mention http://www.wikiprofessional.org/portal/ as a
note added in proof, and I think the main point of their paper was the
ability to make use of the large, already existing community that
edits Wikipedia, rather than, say, create a new domain-specific Wiki
with a much
On Thursday 10 July 2008, Matthias Samwald wrote:
> It is quite amazing that Huss et al. failed to mention these existing
> resources in their paper.
I agree. I maintain an extensive (ridiculous) list of somewhere near
13,000 bookmarks for my own, personal use, however I do release the
informat
On Thursday 10 July 2008, Dan Brickley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From a quick skim I don't see mention of W3C, RDF, Semantic Web etc
> --- I was wondering if anyone here was involved and had contacts,
> since there's doubtless some overlap in interests and approach. In
> particular I was think
There are existing Wikis with RDF/OWL integration for the exact use case
described in that paper.
For example:
WikiProteins
http://genomebiology.com/2008/9/5/R89
http://www.wikiprofessional.org/portal/
BOWiki
http://bowiki.net/wiki/index.php/Main_page
It is quite amazing that Huss et al. fai
http://www.itnews.com.au/News/80128,wikipedia-hosts-human-gene-repository.aspx
[[
U.S. scientists are developing a “Gene Wiki” with the aim of fostering a
flexible, organic archive of human genetic information.
The project exists within Wikipedia, and is expected to speed up the
process of de
Hi Bryan,
please see below,
Bryan Bishop wrote:
Hey all,
I am new to the list, but I really should have known about this group
years ago. I am running a semantic web project oriented that is best
summarized as apt-get for physical automation. Today, while writing
some perl to steal the hum
11 matches
Mail list logo
