Hi,
Just a reminder for Thursday's TM teleconference cal:
''' Conference Details'''
* Date of Call: Thursday June 23 2011
* Time of Call: 12:00pm - 1:00pm ET
* Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
* Dial-In #: +33.4.26.46.79.03 (Paris, France)
* Dial-In #: +44.203.318.0479 (London, UK
[Apologies for cross-posting]
Deadline Extension: June 27, 2011
We have received multiple requests for an extension to the submission deadline
for the Third Canadian Semantic Web Symposium (http://csws2011.uwaterloo.ca/).
To accommodate these requests, we are extending the submission deadline
Dear fellow researchers,
I require some help with my independent study on the topic "E-health 3.0
semantic models as a tool for diagnosis in Pakistan".
Can someone, please review it for me and guide me in the right direction?
and identify any problems or give some input?
I will attach the report,
Apologies for cross-postings
--
2nd CALL FOR PAPERS
--
The Sixth International Workshop on
Today's call is cancelled due to lack of turnout. I received regrets
from many and am afraid that many are under end-of-June pressure. We
will try to reschedule with Steve for another time.
Cheers,
Scott
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:27 PM, M. Scott Marshall
wrote:
> Here is a reminder for tomorrow'
Pat, see my responses inline below.
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
> On Jun 21, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Chime Ogbuji wrote:
> > The Relations Ontology is very central to many of the recently developed
> > biomedical ontologies and (speaking only for myself - since is the realm
Reposting to the list:
> >>> Honestly, I read this stuff and I'm thinking that you aren't listening
> >>> to what you are saying and applying even a minimal amount of critical
> >>> analysis to relate working with RDF to any other kind of skilled
> >>> labor.
> >>
> >> Most skilled workers want t
I ran across this @lamebook, and I couldn't help but draw a parallel to our
conversation :
http://www.lamebook.com/meet-shameful/
in good fun ;)
m.
Hi,
Il giorno 22/giu/2011, alle ore 06.13, Pat Hayes ha scritto:
>
>> (but primarily to biomedical ontologies - hence the relevance to this
>> interest group mailing list) and as much as I agree with you about the
>> issues associated with requiring opaque identifiers, this discussion is
>> ac
