Re: HPO and Gene Ontology Licenses

Hi Peter, I understand completely. The usage policy is very liberal in terms of distribution and we are glad for that! Would it be possible for us (Michel and I) to make suggestions with the goal of publishing a version that matches the no-blank-node policy that Bio2RDF attempts to follow and use

HPO and Gene Ontology Licenses

On 8 August 2012 02:46, Chris Mungall wrote: > Hi Michael > > I can't seem to connect to the triplestore. > > Have you considered adding associations between OMIM and phenotype ontology > classes? These can be downloaded from > http://www.human-phenotype-ontology.org/ as tab delimited files that c

Re: OMIM

Hi Chris, We'll be moving the new omim build to the bio2rdf server (along with new builds for pharmgkb, ncbi gene, CTD, drugbank, and a few others). I've put the store back up for now. There are associations to HPO already in omim. For instance: http://bio2rdf.semanticscience.org:8009/describe

RE: OMIM

Hi Michael, There is another resource that broadly defines the relationships between diseases and genes. The paper was published in 2009 Annotating the human genome with Disease Ontology www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/10/S1/S6/ A recent rede

Re: OMIM

Hi Michael I can't seem to connect to the triplestore. Have you considered adding associations between OMIM and phenotype ontology classes? These can be downloaded from http://www.human-phenotype-ontology.org/ as tab delimited files that can trivially be converted to an rdf model of choice (we

HCLS wide teleconference call

Hi all, This is a reminder for today's HCLS wide conference call to be chaired by Charlie. http://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLSIG/Meetings/2012-08-07_Conference_Call cheers, m.