On Apr 3, 2013, at 9:00 PM, Peter Ansell wrote:
> On 4 April 2013 11:58, David Booth wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 05:02 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 2, 2013, David Booth wrote:
> On 03/27/2013 10:56 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2013, at 7:32 PM, Jim McCusker wrote:
>
Dropping Jim from cc in deference to him finishing his defense.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:58 PM, David Booth wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 05:02 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, April 2, 2013, David Booth wrote:
>> On 03/27/2013 10:56 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
>> On Mar 27, 2013, at 7:
On 4 April 2013 11:58, David Booth wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 05:02 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, April 2, 2013, David Booth wrote:
>> On 03/27/2013 10:56 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
>> On Mar 27, 2013, at 7:32 PM, Jim McCusker wrote:
>>
>> If only owl:sameAs were used
On 04/02/2013 05:02 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
On Tuesday, April 2, 2013, David Booth wrote:
On 03/27/2013 10:56 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
On Mar 27, 2013, at 7:32 PM, Jim McCusker wrote:
If only owl:sameAs were used correctly...
Well, I agree that is a problem, but d
Thanks Michael
this is helpful, we are thinking about various ways of selecting what gets
mapped …
While it is blindingly obvious that to each person looking at a VCF file "the
vast majority are going to turn out to be uninteresting" the difficulty I am
having is whether we (as essentially a
Hi Jeremy,
I worked with genomic data very similar to yours, and initially used
blank nodes for exactly the purpose that you describe below. However, I
regretted doing so when I realized that every time I loaded some of the
same source data, duplicate triples were added, because the system di
hi jeremy,
sorry i missed your talk this morning, it was early on the west coast.
'I am assuming that the data lines can largely be addressed by reading the
INFO, FORMAT and FILTER definitions at the top of the file, and handling
appropriately'
yes, certainly for the standard annotations b
On 4/3/13 4:07 PM, Michel Dumontier wrote:
The major motivation for avoiding blank nodes is that you cannot
reliably refer to those objects from outside the dataset. It precludes
any kind of linking or argumentation.
Yes, I know that re., Linked Data scenarios :-)
In Bio2RDF, we generate URIs
The major motivation for avoiding blank nodes is that you cannot reliably
refer to those objects from outside the dataset. It precludes any kind of
linking or argumentation. In Bio2RDF, we generate URIs for all objects, and
use the identifier when provided, otherwise we generate one when there is
n
On 4/3/13 3:12 PM, Jeremy J Carroll wrote:
>There is, I think, a sustainable argument that blank nodes are not*necessary*.
I beg to differ. Blank nodes are absolutely necessary.
"Horses for courses" again.
Blank nodes are only problematic when misunderstood and used
inappropriately. No diffe
One question that I didn't really answer today was about my choice to use blank
nodes extensively following
http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/
[[
we did not give meaningful names to instances of properties or to the classes
used to represent instances of n-ary relations, but merely la
Joanne, Matthias and all,
As you know may know, Mayo Clinic is one of the NIH designated Pharmacogenomics
Research Network (PGRN) site, and pharmacogenomics of Major Depressive Disorder
is one of the main focus. Our team has made significant progress in developing
EHR-based treatment response a
Apologies for cross-posting
Please forward this message to any potential colleagues in the areas of interest
DEADLINE APPROACHING
International Workshop on Definitions in Ontologies (DO 2013)
July 7, 2013
At ICBO 2013 (International Conference on Biomedical Ontologies)
Montreal, Canada
Website:
Thanks for this. I am sorry I was unable to make the meeting today. I had two
others going on at the same time!
I'm interested in following up on the Depression work (thanks Bob Powers for
the Skype note) and will follow-up next week.
Kind regards,
Joanne
On Apr 3, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Matthias S
The meeting minutes are available at
http://www.w3.org/2013/04/03-HCLS-minutes.html
Cheers,
Matthias
From: Matthias Samwald
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 2:56 PM
To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Reminder: Clinical Pharmacogenomics Teleconference
This is a reminder of the Clinical
This is a reminder of the Clinical Pharmacogenomics Teleconference today at
10:15 Eastern Time (16:15 Central European Time). Here is the suggested agenda:
a.. Jeremy Carroll will present his work on VCF and RDF.
a.. Presentation slides:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013
16 matches
Mail list logo
