**
TSD 2015 - PRELIMINARY CALL FOR PAPERS
**
Eighteenth International Conference on TEXT, SPEECH and DIALOGUE (TSD 2015)
Plzen (Pil
**
TSD 2015 - PRELIMINARY CALL FOR PAPERS
**
Eighteenth International Conference on TEXT, SPEECH and DIALOGUE (TSD 2015)
Plzen (Pil
**
TSD 2015 - PRELIMINARY CALL FOR PAPERS
**
Eighteenth International Conference on TEXT, SPEECH and DIALOGUE (TSD 2015)
Plzen (Pil
**
TSD 2015 - PRELIMINARY CALL FOR PAPERS
**
Eighteenth International Conference on TEXT, SPEECH and DIALOGUE (TSD 2015)
Plzen (Pil
Hi Michel,
as everybody knows, atomic means 'indivisible'. In the world of Nature, of
course, there is nothing atomic.
However, in the world of RDF subject, predicate, and object are atomic -
there are no other concepts these three could be subdivided into.
I haven't seen such a property so far in
I checked with ICBO 2014 organizers and they
said that they need a few more weeks to publish the ICBO papers online.
For a temporary solution as suggested by Scott, I uploaded a copy of my
paper in dropbox and make it publicly available. Hope this can close the
action item.
https://dl.dropboxuser
Hi Vladimir,
Can you elaborate with a definition for 'isAtomicPartOf'? Is this
already defined in a vocabulary?
m.
Michel Dumontier
Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University
Chair, W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and the Life Sciences Interest Group
http://
Well, FHIR brings in a mixture of things. It defines structures (with
relationships) but it also defines coded terms (with subsumption
hierarchies and in theory other kinds of relationships, though none of
those yet). I think the initial focus is an owl representation for the
structures. On the
hcls-ACTION-11: Get the document on the web
http://www.w3.org/2014/HCLS/track/actions/11
Assigned to: Rob Frost
hcls-ACTION-10: And joshua to report on c-cda rdf representations work plan
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action07]
http://www.w3.org/2014/HCLS/track/actions/10
Assigned to: Eric Prud'hommeaux
hcls-ACTION-9: Establish/make a wiki page for c-cda rdf representations work
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action06] -- pend
http://www.w3.org/2014/HCLS/track/actions/9
Assigned to: Eric Prud'hommeaux
hcls-ACTION-7: Set up tracker meeting name [recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2014/11/25-hcls-minutes.html#action01] -- done
http://www.w3.org/2014/HCLS/track/actions/7
Assigned to: Eric Prud'hommeaux
hcls-ACTION-8: Figure out whether he can share uri conventions for icd-11
[recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/25-hcls-minutes.html#action07] --
pending
http://www.w3.org/2014/HCLS/track/actions/8
Assigned to: Guoqian Jiang
Yes. On the profile side, I'm certainly expecting that we'll be looking at
adding extensions to profile that allow manifesting relationships between
and abstractions of resources and properties, for a start.
--
Lloyd McKenzie
+1-780-993-9501
Note: Unless ex
Hi,
how about 'isAtomicPartOf'?
Vladimir
On 8 December 2014 at 18:04, Michel Dumontier
wrote:
> Hi all,
> On the call today we discussed the issue [1] of linking a symbol in
> a triple (e.g. a subject, a predicate, *or* an object) to a dataset.
> The use case for this is twofold : to provide
15 matches
Mail list logo