Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)

2014-12-11 Thread David Booth
Thanks Vipul, I've added them to the wiki for consideration: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Ontology_Requirements David On 12/10/2014 04:59 PM, Vipul Kashyap wrote: Good list, Lloyd. Would like to suggest some more additions (apologies if these have already been suggested). ·Clearly

Re: linking a symbol with a dataset

2014-12-11 Thread Jim McCusker
FRBR has a partOf relation: http://vocab.org/frbr/core#partOf It's domain and range are Endeavour, which is defined as "A class whose members are any of the products of artistic or creative endeavour." An RDF graph definitely counts (I would use Expression to talk about an abstract graph, see htt

Re: linking a symbol with a dataset

2014-12-11 Thread Michel Dumontier
Thanks for this suggestion Anders. I'm somewhat concerned about the semantics of schema.org, but it's clear that there could be a mapping from something more precise to schema.org. m. Michel Dumontier Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University Chair, W3C Semantic

Re: linking a symbol with a dataset

2014-12-11 Thread Michel Dumontier
Hi Vladimir, As you say, nothing is atomic. Even the symbols in the s,p,o slots represent entities that may very well be divisible. In SIO, we developed a property called 'has direct part' [1], which enables modelers to specifically select objects of interest. While not exactly what you suggested,

Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)

2014-12-11 Thread David Booth
Hi John, On 12/11/2014 09:54 AM, john.e.matti...@kp.org wrote: One of my favorite tweets was that "Ontology is a one word oxymoron". Since ontologies are intended to be faithful to a specific set of both design principles and objectives for using the relevant data and data relationships, the "dr

RE: linking a symbol with a dataset

2014-12-11 Thread R. Cornet
I would think Mick Jagger's tongue is definetely part of the Rolling Stones :). But seriously... When referring to being part of a dataset It feels to me like you're saying "Rolling Stones partOf Wikipedia:British_Rock_Lemma" Or, alternatively: head structure partOf body; head structure partOf SN

Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)

2014-12-11 Thread Lloyd McKenzie
Well that's one piece. The other is that we'd also have to have an ontology that linked the SNOMED "concept" to the FHIR expression. I.e. "codeable concept with coding that has code=foo and system=" http://snomed.info/snomedct"; is a specialization of [snomed concept foo]" - and we'll have to do

funded PhD positions

2014-12-11 Thread Saeedeh Shekarpour
Dear all, I apologise for cross-posting, The Institute of Computer Science III at the University of Bonn, Germany, is searching for: Three full time PhD students in the field of Semantic Web / Linked Data. On top of a generous basic salary we offer a mobility allowance and, if ap