Re: Summary of HL7 RDF / W3C COI call: FHIR Ontology Requirements

I agree with Lloyd. However, we need to keep in mind that semantic web standard languages especially OWL rely on Open World Assumption (OWA): http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-guide-20040210/#StructureOfOntologies For validation purposes, while respecting OWA, it is still possible validate dat

Re: Summary of HL7 RDF / W3C COI call: FHIR Ontology Requirements

I expect we'll need to be able to handle both open-world and closed-world versions of the ontology. Closed-world is essential to validation. If a profile says something is 1..1 and the instance doesn't have it, then that needs to be flagged as an error, which open-world wouldn't do. On the other

Re: Summary of HL7 RDF / W3C COI call: FHIR Ontology Requirements

Hi Sajjad, On 02/04/2015 07:12 AM, Sajjad Hussain wrote: Hi All, Responding to Action # 2 carried during last call: http://www.w3.org/2015/02/03-hcls-minutes.html#action02 I would suggest the following wording for FHIR Ontology Require

Agenda for Tue Feb 10 HL7 RDF / W3C COI call: FHIR Ontology Requirements & Common model

On Tuesday's call we'll continue where we left off last week: * FHIR Ontology Requirements -- Finish and approve * Common model for data element management and value set binding Anyone suggested changes to the current draft FHIR ontology requirements should please be written and sent to the grou

[CfP] Linked Data Quality #LDQ2015 Call for Papers

LDQ 2015 CALL FOR PAPERS 2nd Workshop on Linked Data Quality co-located with ESWC 2015, Portorož, Slovenia June 1, 2015 http://ldq.semanticmultimedia.org/ Important Dates * Submission of research papers: March 6, 2015 * Notification of paper acceptance: April 3, 2015 * Submission of camera-r