>
>
> It seems to me that privacy needs to be addressed at the level of
> protocols and policies. What are you suggesting relevant to
> vocabularies, such as schema.org?
>
well, the vocabularies often need to support this. The most relevant
thing is to tag the information with consent to share in
On 05/27/2016 03:10 AM, Renato Iannella wrote:
On 27 May 2016, at 11:09, David Booth wrote:
I think it is important to distinguish two separate and orthogonal
concerns:
>> 1. What data should be shared or exchanged?
>> 2. What does the data mean?
>> Security and privacy are all about #1 --
re:https://schema.org/Physician
Hi Renato,
Some of your thoughts need a deep discussions. Can you attend one of
ScheMed or FHIR RDF group meetings and raise such points? This will allow
to associate other's views as well.
I will just make a small comment on the https://schema.org/Physician.
Th
> On 27 May 2016, at 11:09, David Booth wrote:
> I think it is important to distinguish two separate and orthogonal concerns:
> 1. What data should be shared or exchanged?
> 2. What does the data mean?
> Security and privacy are all about #1 -- not #2.
> Schema.org and healthcare vocabularies
