Re: Overview of conferences (like C-SHALS)

2009-01-23 Thread Bryan Bishop
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 6:09 AM, M. Scott Marshall wrote: > I have always wanted a one-stop calendar/conference site. However, I am not > aware of a comprehensive solution that can provide you practical search > results for "something in Aug-Dec 2009" that presumably also has something > to do wi

Re: Pharma Ontology

2009-01-08 Thread Bryan Bishop
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Susie M Stephens wrote: > Lilly is interested in working with the community to develop a high-level > patient centric ontology that can be used for translational medicine. We > are hoping to undertake this work in collaboration with W3C's Health Care > and Life Sci

Re: 'Gene WIki' announced

2008-08-29 Thread Bryan Bishop
On Tuesday 19 August 2008, Kei Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm exploring the idea of creating "Wiki Neuron" based on my past > activities in the HCLSIG. I've recently added a description of this > idea called "Visual Web Meets Semantic Web" to the list of HCSLIG > project ideas (http://esw

Re: Survey on reading habits

2008-08-09 Thread Bryan Bishop
On Saturday 02 August 2008, Tudor Groza wrote: > We are currently conducting an online survey on reading habits. The > purpose of the survey is to understand some of the usual habits that > researchers have while reading scientific publications and to learn > about the necessary steps to be taken

Re: 'Gene WIki' announced

2008-07-10 Thread Bryan Bishop
On Thursday 10 July 2008, "Matthias Samwald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A slight shift in topic: I wonder how secure such specialised types > of wiki content are from vandalisaton or errors introduced by > improper use. Generally, wikis can counter such threats through the > power of the 'thousa

Re: 'Gene WIki' announced

2008-07-10 Thread Bryan Bishop
On Thursday 10 July 2008, Roderic Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually, they do mention http://www.wikiprofessional.org/portal/ as > a   note added in proof, and I think the main point of their paper > was the ability to make use of the large, already existing community > that edits Wikipedi

Re: 'Gene WIki' announced

2008-07-10 Thread Bryan Bishop
On Thursday 10 July 2008, Matthias Samwald wrote: > It is quite amazing that Huss et al. failed to mention these existing > resources in their paper. I agree. I maintain an extensive (ridiculous) list of somewhere near 13,000 bookmarks for my own, personal use, however I do release the informat

Re: 'Gene WIki' announced

2008-07-10 Thread Bryan Bishop
On Thursday 10 July 2008, Dan Brickley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >  From a quick skim I don't see mention of W3C, RDF, Semantic Web etc > --- I was wondering if anyone here was involved and had contacts, > since there's doubtless some overlap in interests and approach. In > particular I was think

Join message

2008-07-09 Thread Bryan Bishop
Hey all, I am new to the list, but I really should have known about this group years ago. I am running a semantic web project oriented that is best summarized as apt-get for physical automation. Today, while writing some perl to steal the humancortex data from the Allen Institute, I stumbled