+1
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Deborah L McGuinness
wrote:
> I vote for tues at 11 eastern time
> Deborah
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Oct 28, 2014, at 8:08 PM, David Booth wrote:
> >
> > Those who wish to participate in the "RDF for Semantic Interoperability"
> sub-group of the HL7 IT
Sage Bionetworks just completed its fourth Commons Congress. See
http://sagecongress.org/WP/ for more.
Jack
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Trish Whetzel wrote:
> The next NCBO Webinar will be presented by Mike Kellen from Sage
> Bionetworks on "Accelerating Health Advances through Open Chal
If I may, I wish to offer a view to a possible expansion of the scope
of this important project.
In a paper "Just for me: topic maps and ontologies"
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2096517 (and available as a pdf
online at citeseer)
Adam Cheyer and I tell about an approach to expanding the DARP
I would argue that "shooting oneself in the foot" may not be as much
an issue as the one Wikipedia got into when it assigned personal names
to topics, only to find there were others with the same name equally
worthy of a topic.
Jack
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
> If I might
Brief comment following the call.
I mentioned Oren Etzioni at U.Washington and the DARPA BAA on "machine
reading". I believe those two entities signal a change at some level
in thinking about text harvesting.
As part of my thesis proposal [1], I describe what I call an
"anticipatory story reader"
Can we perform a mashup on the two positions?
Someone who created a SPARQL end point has, by some means, created an
interpretation (graph) to query based on some document. Perhaps other
SPARQL end points would have different interpretations?
Just a tenth EURO...
Jack
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:3
Looking at BrainInfo [1], which, as I recall, serves as a nomenclature
source for UMLS, the two names, telencephalon, and cerebrum, are
treated separately; neither mentions the other as a synonym (unless I
missed something).
Jack
[1] http://braininfo.rprc.washington.edu/Default.aspx
On Thu, Mar 2
Just in case this wasn't posted here before, any interest in semantic
wiki evolution might be interested in this conference call today.
Cheers,
Jack
Original Message
Subject: [swikig] invitation to semantic wiki mini-series -- planning
telco TODAY 7.30 pm CEST
Date: Thu, 1
+1
Jack
On May 29, 2008, at 7:10 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
I wonder if we could include a line remembering Bill Bug in the KB
note. Something simple along the lines of
"In memory of our friend and colleague William Bug, Ontological
Engineer"
-Alan
Xiaoshu Wang wrote:
Kei Cheung wrote:
Hi Eric et al,
I'm glad that umls, topic map, ... were mentioned. We have to do more
than literal translation or linguistics. It's semantics!
Traditional Chinese medicine embodies rich dialectical thought, such
as that of the holistic connections a
ly and technologically interesting.
Thanks,
-Kei
eric neumann wrote:
Why not simply use to following trick on top of universal symbols?
Eric
2008/5/28 Jack Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
In cross-language data integration, it may be a simple matter of
u
In cross-language data integration, it may be a simple matter of using a
multitude of language-scoped labels in an ontology. Another approach
that has been mentioned on this list many moons back by the late Bill
Bugg was that of applying topic maps to the federation of heterogeneous
resources, inc
Let me toss out a few ideas (possibly longish - sorry). These thoughts
might appear somewhat like the famous Larson cartoon where Joe is
speaking to his dog Bowser:
What Joe said: "Bowser, I'm going to toss a bone, then you go fetch the
bone"
What Bowser heard: "Bowserbone!bone"
Most
ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Mereotopology1.pdf
[2] http://xml.coverpages.org/iff.html
[3] http://users.actcom.co.il/typographics/zippie/
[4] http://rosen-enterprises.com/RobertRosen/biotheorylaunch.html
William Bug wrote:
Oops - I forgot to add...
Again - in this area, I think the TMR
I think that these valuable ideas can be supplemented by an additional
set of properties (here, I am making a perhaps false assumption that
Eric's "strawperson" proposal doesn't already anticipate subject
identity properties). Appealing to Peircian notions for subject identity
is, I believe,
sociation with the work
started in the FMA a foundational ontology for biomedicine (the
Ontology of Biological Reality) that is becoming increasingly
important to all of the ontologies being monitored by NCBO and
incorporated into the OBO site and the emerging OBO Foundary
(http://obofoundry.org/).
16 matches
Mail list logo
