Per the conversation during the July 9 Telecon:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Meetings/2007-07-09_Conference_Call
attached is a summary of query accesses to the demo from the webserver logs
of hcls1.csail.mit.edu:8890 and hcls2.csail.mit.edu:8890. The dates in the
webserver logs
The minutes from the 7/2/07 BIORDF telcon are available at:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Meetings/2007-07-02_Conference_Call
jb
magnocellular oxytocin neuron has
the molecule oxytocin within
jb
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Barkley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jonathan Rees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "chris munga
ine magnocellular oxytocin neuron
http://purl.org/commons/pubmed/_7451682"/>
http://purl.org/commons/pubmed/_3327422"/>
jb
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: &
I posted a new version of BAMS on the wiki page
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/HCLSIG_DemoHomePage_HCLSIG_Demo
This version includes the part_has_molecule_in_region properties for parts
that was inadvertenly left out of the previous versions. This version should
be complete except for the additio
I posted an updated version of BAMS on the wiki page
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/HCLSIG_DemoHomePage_HCLSIG_Demo
This version includes a technique from Alan (naturally) that minimizes the
number of triples required for mutual disjoints between classes using a
classId functional property. Using
chris,
I appreciate your comments, and I agree that if the demo is to show the
superiority of the semantic web approach, then that section should be more
carefully worded. I was trying to create something that would be
(reasonably) readable by RDB and XML practitioners who are likely not to
thanks,
jb
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Barkley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: updated bams model
This looks great, John, go for it!
minor: remove "
ot a
neuroscientist.
thanks,
jb
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John Barkley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: bams class style model
Just had a discussion with John, summa
For another one of my action items, I put on the wiki demo page:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/HCLSIG_DemoHomePage_HCLSIG_Demo
a reference to the initial bams class style model and an updated bams
instance
style model. In both, I made the properties "has_source" and "has_target"
transitive. Plea
I put the updated bams instance style model on the wiki page
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/HCLSIG_DemoHomePage_HCLSIG_Demo
The new version modifies the old version according to Alan's suggestions
from tuesday's f2f.
jb
A new draft of the "Benefits" section, that includes text from Kei, is now
up on:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/HCLSIG_DemoHomePage_HCLSIG_Demo
I was able to create an account for myself. Thanks to whoever took care of
the problem.
jb
Now that's a demo script! ;-)
To be sure!
Hopefully, our demo will also show that people are "sharing ...
collaborating"
using knowledge representations, not just information representations
(and, incidentally, that for representing knowledge, OWL/RDF is superior
to other methods).
jb
Another good article on this subject is:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/semantic_technologies/pdf/vldb_2005.pdf
jb
From: William Bug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 16:41:01 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls
To: Susie Stephens <[EMAIL PROT
Per the discussion at the HCLS ISWC Workshop, the OWL version of the NIST
HIV Structural Database is available at
http://xpdb.nist.gov/hiv2_d/download.html
jb
exity of entailment for RDF Schema
and a semantic extension involving the OWL vocabulary, Herman J. ter
Horst, Journal of Web Semantics, (2005) 79-115.
regards,
Ivan
Matthias Samwald wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:08:36 -0400, Kashyap, Vipul wrote:
>
>
>> Discuss tasks for discussion
The minutes of the August 14 BioRDF telecon are available at:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Meetings/2006-08-14_Conference_Call
jb
e of the person once a year.
If I understand the uniqueness requirement of LSIDs, then a new LSID for
"Michael Miller" must be created every year when the age property changes.
jb
- Original Message -
From: "Miller, Michael D (Rosetta)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
The global uniqueness requirement of LSIDs is clear if one is talking about
something like an image. As we discussed on yesterday's telecon, if one bit
in an image is changed, then the LSID must change. My question is how does
this work with an LSID that dereferences to RDF. Consider the following
In the context of the URI Best Practices discussion, I would be interested
in hearing everyone's opinion on httpRange-14. Is this something acceptable
as is? Should it be modified/extended for Life Sciences? Section 6 of:
http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin/irw2006/hhalpin.pdf
has a nice summary of t
hi alan,
> On the matter of what a URI dereferences to, I think it is more
> important to get the names in place quickly.
I agree. I think we are all ready to start on the demo. Nonetheless, getting
the names in place quickly does not mean they cannot dereference. According
to:
http://www.w3.org
I put some slides together for this morning's discussion:
http://hissa.nist.gov/jb/neuro-db-integration-model/jb-strawman-model-biont-telecon-6-6-06.pdf
jb
- Original Message -
From: "Kashyap, Vipul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:15 PM
Subject: [BIONT] Telecon
>From this week's BIONT teleconference discussion, I put together an example
illustrating one way RDF/OWL could be used to integrate databases (DB) using
vocabularies. This approach is inspired by the merged/neuron/cocodat
knowledge bases (KB) at http://128.36.123.50/NeuroWeb/.
merged.owl integrat
As a result of yesterday's discussion about "standard" vocabulary URIs, I
thought I would illustrate the point I was trying to make with an example.
The point I was trying to make concerned the difference between a URI that
references some RDF somewhere and a URI that references something that is
alan,
> Perhaps we could review these at our next conference call. For
> instance the ontologies choose to create an instance of each leaf
> class for populating instances corresponding to database entries with
> these values. What do people think of this?
This is an often used technique to keep
Notes from Monday's BioRDF call are at:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Meetings/2006-04-17_Conference_Call
jb
I believe there is an additional advantage beyond semantics and the "web".
I would suggest that the quality of information models can be significantly
improved using semantic web methods and tools as compared to those developed
using other methods in common use, e.g., relational, XML, UML. With
hi folks,
Notes for the BioRDF Conference Call on March 27, 2006 have been posted at:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Meetings/2006-03-27_Conference_Call
jb
Per our conversation from yesterdays conference call, here are some examples
of our format conversion efforts which include text/RDB/XML to RDF.
DADS (http://www.nist.gov/dads/) is a scholarly work by our Paul Black. It
began in 1995, before we got involved with the semantic web. Its html pages
a
29 matches
Mail list logo
