Re: Invitation to review the health extension in schema.org

2016-03-25 Thread Timothy W. Cook
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Marc Twagirumukiza wrote: > Dear ALL, > > This is an invitation to help in reviewing the health extension vocab in > schema.org as it's now targeted to be published soon. > > ​Is there an actual date assigned for publication? It would be helpful to know. --Tim ​

Re: Anil Sinaci on the SALUS project & EU health records -- RECORDING NOW AVAILABLE

2015-06-20 Thread Timothy W. Cook
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:24 PM, David Booth wrote: > A recording of Anil's presentation is now available: > https://mit.webex.com/mit/lsr.php?RCID=efbe6daefbc642ffba8b03b13c5f4cbd > Unfortunately it requires a MS Windows or Mac download. We have not yet > figured out how to make it available fo

Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)

2014-12-22 Thread Timothy W. Cook
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Lloyd McKenzie wrote: > Hi Tony, > > The RDF instances would always reference the standard resource and data > type profiles. They wouldn't ever reference narrower profiles, except > possibly at the top level. I.e. If I've got an address, the instance will > alw

Re: FHIR Ontology from Cecil Lynch

2014-12-21 Thread Timothy W. Cook
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 8:08 PM, David Booth wrote: > > But FYI, the reason Cecil presented his ontology was to allow us to > compare and contrast the various approaches that different individuals have > taken toward developing a FHIR ontology. (Others were presented > previously.) The joint HL

Re: Minutes of last week's (Dec 2) HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup / W3C HCLS COI call -- Review of FHIR ontology approaches (cont.)

2014-12-14 Thread Timothy W. Cook
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 10:34 PM, David Booth wrote: > > You might be able to extend XML that way, and it would be interesting to > see what you could come up with, but if you went down that path I suspect > you'd find at some point that you were ending up re-inventing RDF. > > Thanks, > David Boo

Re: health care schema

2013-12-05 Thread Timothy W. Cook
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Bradley, Lily (HHS/ASPE) < lily.brad...@hhs.gov> wrote: > I work on open data at the US Department of Health and Human Services. > > > > Are there schema/linked data efforts that could help us markup HHS data > better? Beyond, medical/biomedical/drugs, for instance

Re: [LLD] Reminder: Dataset descriptions 5PM CET / 11AM ET Monday Nov 25

2013-11-24 Thread Timothy W. Cook
I hope there will be minutes or a recording as I will be at a startup challenge finals event tomorrow. --Tim On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 3:47 PM, M. Scott Marshall wrote: > I will likely be late because my plane lands at 16:10 but Michel will chair. > -Scott > > Duration: ~1 hour (Variable) frequenc

Re: Clinical documents metadata

2013-11-14 Thread Timothy W. Cook
Interesting. But kind of 1990's all over again. Metadata requirements are generalized and very well defined for electronic documentation. Dr. Benson doesn't specify any type of controlled vocabulary nor even a datatype for any item except date/time. Dublin Core is well accepted and used through

Re: Ontology Visualization with Domains and Ranges

2013-10-10 Thread Timothy W. Cook
to do the kind of visualization > I'm looking for in Protege. I know how to make graphs that show class > hierarchies, but I don't know how to make graphs that show property > domains, ranges and restrictions. > > Best, > Oliver > > > > On Thu, Oc

Re: Ontology Visualization with Domains and Ranges

2013-10-10 Thread Timothy W. Cook
Have you tried Protege? http://protege.stanford.edu/ On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm looking for a tool to visualize ontologies while showing domains and > ranges of properties, and property restrictions. > > For example, if a property p ha

public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org

2013-06-20 Thread Timothy W. Cook
I thought that this might be of interest to this group. It is supposed to be a discussion about the good, the bad and the ugly of healthcare concept modelling. With a tilt towards the harmonization of HL7 and openEHR. I thought it might be good to have members from here participate as well. htt