On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Marc Twagirumukiza
wrote:
> Dear ALL,
>
> This is an invitation to help in reviewing the health extension vocab in
> schema.org as it's now targeted to be published soon.
>
>
Is there an actual date assigned for publication? It would be helpful to
know.
--Tim
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:24 PM, David Booth wrote:
> A recording of Anil's presentation is now available:
> https://mit.webex.com/mit/lsr.php?RCID=efbe6daefbc642ffba8b03b13c5f4cbd
> Unfortunately it requires a MS Windows or Mac download. We have not yet
> figured out how to make it available fo
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Lloyd McKenzie wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> The RDF instances would always reference the standard resource and data
> type profiles. They wouldn't ever reference narrower profiles, except
> possibly at the top level. I.e. If I've got an address, the instance will
> alw
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 8:08 PM, David Booth wrote:
>
> But FYI, the reason Cecil presented his ontology was to allow us to
> compare and contrast the various approaches that different individuals have
> taken toward developing a FHIR ontology. (Others were presented
> previously.) The joint HL
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 10:34 PM, David Booth wrote:
>
> You might be able to extend XML that way, and it would be interesting to
> see what you could come up with, but if you went down that path I suspect
> you'd find at some point that you were ending up re-inventing RDF.
>
> Thanks,
> David Boo
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Bradley, Lily (HHS/ASPE) <
lily.brad...@hhs.gov> wrote:
> I work on open data at the US Department of Health and Human Services.
>
>
>
> Are there schema/linked data efforts that could help us markup HHS data
> better? Beyond, medical/biomedical/drugs, for instance
I hope there will be minutes or a recording as I will be at a startup
challenge finals event tomorrow.
--Tim
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 3:47 PM, M. Scott Marshall
wrote:
> I will likely be late because my plane lands at 16:10 but Michel will chair.
> -Scott
>
> Duration: ~1 hour (Variable) frequenc
Interesting. But kind of 1990's all over again. Metadata
requirements are generalized and very well defined for electronic
documentation. Dr. Benson doesn't specify any type of controlled
vocabulary nor even a datatype for any item except date/time.
Dublin Core is well accepted and used through
to do the kind of visualization
> I'm looking for in Protege. I know how to make graphs that show class
> hierarchies, but I don't know how to make graphs that show property
> domains, ranges and restrictions.
>
> Best,
> Oliver
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oc
Have you tried Protege?
http://protege.stanford.edu/
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for a tool to visualize ontologies while showing domains and
> ranges of properties, and property restrictions.
>
> For example, if a property p ha
I thought that this might be of interest to this group. It is
supposed to be a discussion about the good, the bad and the ugly of
healthcare concept modelling. With a tilt towards the harmonization
of HL7 and openEHR.
I thought it might be good to have members from here participate as well.
htt
11 matches
Mail list logo