Re: [public-semweb-lifesci] AD/PD use case document

2007-02-19 Thread William Bug
95 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:public-semweb- lifesci- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Samwald Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 1:33 PM To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org Subject: [public-semweb-lifesci] AD/PD use case document Regarding the use case docum

RE: [public-semweb-lifesci] AD/PD use case document

2007-02-19 Thread Kashyap, Vipul
1:33 PM > To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > Subject: [public-semweb-lifesci] AD/PD use case document > > > > Regarding the use case document Don sent to the mailing list today: > > Are some of the hypotheses already available in SWAN's RDF format? It > would be g

Re: [public-semweb-lifesci] AD/PD use case document

2007-02-19 Thread Tim Clark
Matthias, We have just completed a major revision to our ontology, and will be re-coding these hypotheses. We will be happy to share the OWL ontology itself and will work to get out an example hypothesis in SWAN 1.0 version as soon as we can. We will be submitting a paper giving an over

[public-semweb-lifesci] AD/PD use case document

2007-02-19 Thread Matthias Samwald
Regarding the use case document Don sent to the mailing list today: Are some of the hypotheses already available in SWAN's RDF format? It would be great to see an example of how they would look as RDF statements. This would make it easier for the rest of us to judge how other RDF datasources c