Excellent, Vipul
Looking forward to that, Chimezie
Regards
Kerstin
Forsberg, Kerstin L
> Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 3:38 PM
> To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> Subject: RE: A problem-oriented medical record OWL ontology
>
>
> Chimezie,
> the clinical recording ontology you describe in the documentation
> on the Wiki do look very interestin
Chimezie,
the clinical recording ontology you describe in the documentation
on the Wiki do look very interesting:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2006Dec/0002.html
May I suggest that you walk us through the core of it, and your key
learnings from developing it, in a sui
I've since updated this ontology (attached to the ESW Wiki) as well as the
documentation on the Wiki. Currently, it aligns with GALEN (the more
recent Open Galen model), Helen's OWL extract of the HL7 RIM, Barry
Smith's Ontology of Biomedical Reality (OBR), DOLCE, and the KIF-based
Laborator
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Kashyap, Vipul wrote:
[VK] This reminds me of a discussion I had with Dan Russler and similar to the
above sentiment, the design choices seem to be between one of the following:
1. Modeling the action of recording a clinical information; or ordering a
drug; or making a dia
Thanks Bill - although I think you attribute too much to me here! I
really haven't done much other than make some enquires about how one
would represent content and content bearing entities within a realist
ontological framework. As soon as I start working on this again I'll
make contact
This is a very informal effort Chris Mungall has been leading - and is
directly related to the work he, NCI, OBI, BIRN, and others have been doing
on a shared formalism for expressing ontology-associated metadata - or
AnnotationProperties - or "speech acts" - depending on who you discuss the
Hi Trish,
This is a very informal effort Chris Mungall has been leading - and
is directly related to the work he, NCI, OBI, BIRN, and others have
been doing on a shared formalism for expressing ontology-associated
metadata - or AnnotationProperties - or "speech acts" - depending on
who yo
There is also an informal effort underway in this same context for
associating "speech acts" with the annotations, which relates both to the
"acts" as represented in HL7 RIM and similar contextual qualifiers as
represented in ontologies such as DOLCE & GALEN.
Which effort is this?
Trish
Hi All,
I would also add that the effort amongst OBO Foundry participants to
create a Clinical Trials ontology (http://www.bioontology.org/wiki/
index.php/Workshop_on_Clinical_Trial_Ontology) is focussed on
expressing (2) that Vipul highlights below. They are also looking to
efforts such
Hi Chimezie,
I have just briefly looked through the introduction to your Problem Oriented
Medical Record ontology and I find it very interesting. In the same way as HL7
RIM Acts has a "ontological failings" in mixing up the "concept of the action of
recording clinical information and the phe
Hi Chimezie,
I have just briefly looked through the introduction to your Problem Oriented
Medical Record ontology and I find it very interesting. In the same way as HL7
RIM Acts has a "ontological failings" in mixing up the "concept of the action
of recording clinical information and the phenome
During the teleconference before last we had decided to take a
first shot at a W3C note on the problem statement for computer-based
patient records. I had preferred that we develop literature with guidance
towards solutions in this space as I think the problem statement is well
defined (at l
13 matches
Mail list logo
