Re: Linked Data Glossary is published!

2013-07-09 Thread Melvin Carvalho
On 28 June 2013 18:01, Bernadette Hyland wrote: > Hi Melvin, > Thanks. May I ask you to provide definitions for each of the proposed > terms please? TIA. I believe we'll be able to update assuming the GLD WG > extension is approved. > The most normative definitions I found are: http://www.w3.

Re: Linked Data Glossary is published!

2013-07-02 Thread Gannon Dick
mailing list ; HCLS Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 4:20 PM Subject: Re: Linked Data Glossary is published! I agree Michael, but if you'll excuse the expression, I think we are arguing semantics.   Datasets often have domain specific names for meta data components.   For example, Data Dot Go

Re: Linked Data Glossary is published!

2013-07-02 Thread Gannon Dick
sday, July 2, 2013 10:23 AM Subject: RE: Linked Data Glossary is published! hi all,   XML takes on many levels of machine readability.  i would argue that if XML came with an DTD/XML schema it is at least 3 star and possibly 4 star.  that at least was my experience with MAGE- ML (i'd

RE: Linked Data Glossary is published!

2013-07-02 Thread Michael Miller
inked Data Glossary is published! Hello John, thanks for reply, very much appreciated. 2013/7/2 John Erickson Thus, I think we should distinguish between "plain old XML" and Office Open XML/OOXML/OpenXML; based on my understanding and what I read <> OpenXML could be listed as

Re: Linked Data Glossary is published!

2013-07-01 Thread KANZAKI Masahide
Excuse me, 2-stars and 3-stars data are still good and valuable, though 4-stars+ is, of course, better and encouraged. best regards, 2013/7/2 Young,Jeff (OR) > Two star sucks. So does three star. If you're extremely proud of two and > three star data, you're missing the point. > > -- @prefix

Re: Linked Data Glossary is published!

2013-07-01 Thread Young,Jeff (OR)
Two star sucks. So does three star. If you're extremely proud of two and three star data, you're missing the point. Jeff Sent from my iPad On Jul 1, 2013, at 10:22 PM, "KANZAKI Masahide" mailto:mkanz...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello John, thanks for reply, very much appreciated. 2013/7/2 John Eri

Re: Linked Data Glossary is published!

2013-07-01 Thread KANZAKI Masahide
Hello John, thanks for reply, very much appreciated. 2013/7/2 John Erickson > Thus, I think we should distinguish between "plain old XML" and Office > Open XML/OOXML/OpenXML; based on my understanding and what I read <> > OpenXML could be listed as an example three-star format. Well, that's tr

Re: Linked Data Glossary is published!

2013-07-01 Thread John Erickson
Thanks for your comments, Kanzaki! You wrote: > 1. 5 Star ...: > I'm afraid I don't understand why XML is 2-star (implying proprietary > format), lower rated than CSV. Does it mean Excel ? (but even Excel uses > non-proprietary OpenXML now). > I'd suggest this section should include a link to the

Re: Linked Data Glossary is published!

2013-06-29 Thread KANZAKI Masahide
Hello, congrats on hard efforts. A few comments: 1. 5 Star ...: I'm afraid I don't understand why XML is 2-star (implying proprietary format), lower rated than CSV. Does it mean Excel ? (but even Excel uses non-proprietary OpenXML now). I'd suggest this section should include a link to the TimBL's

Re: Linked Data Glossary is published!

2013-06-28 Thread Bernadette Hyland
Hi Melvin, Thanks. May I ask you to provide definitions for each of the proposed terms please? TIA. I believe we'll be able to update assuming the GLD WG extension is approved. Cheers, Bernadette On Jun 27, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > > > On 27 June 2013 17:08, Bernadet

Re: Linked Data Glossary is published!

2013-06-27 Thread Stéphane Corlosquet
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > > > > On 27 June 2013 17:08, Bernadette Hyland wrote: > >> Hi, >> On behalf of the editors, I'm pleased to announce the publication of the >> peer-reviewed *Linked Data Glossary* published as a W3C Working Group >> Note effective 27-June-2

Re: Linked Data Glossary is published!

2013-06-27 Thread Melvin Carvalho
On 27 June 2013 17:08, Bernadette Hyland wrote: > Hi, > On behalf of the editors, I'm pleased to announce the publication of the > peer-reviewed *Linked Data Glossary* published as a W3C Working Group > Note effective 27-June-2013.[1] > > We hope this document serves as a useful glossary containi

Re: Linked Data Glossary is published!

2013-06-27 Thread Juan Sequeda
Bernadette and all, Congrats! This is an amazing resource. I'm so happy to see all of the terms finally in one place. Also glad to see that R2RML is there. But Direct Mapping [1] is missing. Any chance it could be added in the next iteration? [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb-direct-mapping/ Juan Se

Re: Linked Data Glossary is published!

2013-06-27 Thread Stephane Fellah
Great work ! Thank you for putting this together. I hope this will put at rest some of the terminology discussions that occurred over the last weeks. Sincerely Stephane Fellah On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Bernadette Hyland < bhyl...@3roundstones.com> wrote: > Hi, > On behalf of the editors

Linked Data Glossary is published!

2013-06-27 Thread Bernadette Hyland
Hi, On behalf of the editors, I'm pleased to announce the publication of the peer-reviewed Linked Data Glossary published as a W3C Working Group Note effective 27-June-2013.[1] We hope this document serves as a useful glossary containing terms defined and used to describe Linked Data, and its