On 28 June 2013 18:01, Bernadette Hyland wrote:
> Hi Melvin,
> Thanks. May I ask you to provide definitions for each of the proposed
> terms please? TIA. I believe we'll be able to update assuming the GLD WG
> extension is approved.
>
The most normative definitions I found are:
http://www.w3.
mailing list ; HCLS
Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: Linked Data Glossary is published!
I agree Michael, but if you'll excuse the expression, I think we are arguing
semantics.
Datasets often have domain specific names for meta data components.
For example, Data Dot Go
sday, July 2, 2013 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: Linked Data Glossary is published!
hi all,
XML takes on many levels of machine readability. i would argue that if XML
came with an DTD/XML schema it is at least 3 star and possibly 4 star. that at
least was my experience with MAGE- ML (i'd
inked Data Glossary is published!
Hello John, thanks for reply, very much appreciated.
2013/7/2 John Erickson
Thus, I think we should distinguish between "plain old XML" and Office
Open XML/OOXML/OpenXML; based on my understanding and what I read <>
OpenXML could be listed as
Excuse me, 2-stars and 3-stars data are still good and valuable, though
4-stars+ is, of course, better and encouraged.
best regards,
2013/7/2 Young,Jeff (OR)
> Two star sucks. So does three star. If you're extremely proud of two and
> three star data, you're missing the point.
>
>
--
@prefix
Two star sucks. So does three star. If you're extremely proud of two and three
star data, you're missing the point.
Jeff
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 1, 2013, at 10:22 PM, "KANZAKI Masahide"
mailto:mkanz...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello John, thanks for reply, very much appreciated.
2013/7/2 John Eri
Hello John, thanks for reply, very much appreciated.
2013/7/2 John Erickson
> Thus, I think we should distinguish between "plain old XML" and Office
> Open XML/OOXML/OpenXML; based on my understanding and what I read <>
> OpenXML could be listed as an example three-star format.
Well, that's tr
Thanks for your comments, Kanzaki!
You wrote:
> 1. 5 Star ...:
> I'm afraid I don't understand why XML is 2-star (implying proprietary
> format), lower rated than CSV. Does it mean Excel ? (but even Excel uses
> non-proprietary OpenXML now).
> I'd suggest this section should include a link to the
Hello, congrats on hard efforts. A few comments:
1. 5 Star ...:
I'm afraid I don't understand why XML is 2-star (implying proprietary
format), lower rated than CSV. Does it mean Excel ? (but even Excel uses
non-proprietary OpenXML now).
I'd suggest this section should include a link to the TimBL's
Hi Melvin,
Thanks. May I ask you to provide definitions for each of the proposed terms
please? TIA. I believe we'll be able to update assuming the GLD WG extension
is approved.
Cheers,
Bernadette
On Jun 27, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
>
>
> On 27 June 2013 17:08, Bernadet
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Melvin Carvalho
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 27 June 2013 17:08, Bernadette Hyland wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> On behalf of the editors, I'm pleased to announce the publication of the
>> peer-reviewed *Linked Data Glossary* published as a W3C Working Group
>> Note effective 27-June-2
On 27 June 2013 17:08, Bernadette Hyland wrote:
> Hi,
> On behalf of the editors, I'm pleased to announce the publication of the
> peer-reviewed *Linked Data Glossary* published as a W3C Working Group
> Note effective 27-June-2013.[1]
>
> We hope this document serves as a useful glossary containi
Bernadette and all,
Congrats! This is an amazing resource. I'm so happy to see all of the terms
finally in one place.
Also glad to see that R2RML is there. But Direct Mapping [1] is missing.
Any chance it could be added in the next iteration?
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb-direct-mapping/
Juan Se
Great work ! Thank you for putting this together. I hope this will put at
rest some of the terminology discussions that occurred over the last weeks.
Sincerely
Stephane Fellah
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Bernadette Hyland <
bhyl...@3roundstones.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> On behalf of the editors
Hi,
On behalf of the editors, I'm pleased to announce the publication of the
peer-reviewed Linked Data Glossary published as a W3C Working Group Note
effective 27-June-2013.[1]
We hope this document serves as a useful glossary containing terms defined and
used to describe Linked Data, and its
15 matches
Mail list logo