From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kei cheung
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 9:52 AM
To: Alan Ruttenberg
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Daniel Rubin';
public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; 'Matthew Cockerill'
Subject: Re: MGED/FuGO. was: Re: Bio
> From: kei cheung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 10:34 AM
> To: Miller, Michael D (Rosetta)
> Cc: Alan Ruttenberg; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Daniel Rubin;
> public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; Matthew Cockerill
> Subject: Re: MGED/Fu
M
> To: Miller, Michael D (Rosetta)
> Cc: Alan Ruttenberg; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> Subject: Re: MGED/FuGO. was: Re: BioRDF [Telcon]: slides for
> the UMLS presentation
>
>
> Hi Michael and Larry,
>
> As I understand it, Gavin Sherlock who is a member of MGED is
&g
public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: MGED/FuGO. was: Re: BioRDF [Telcon]: slides for
the UMLS presentation
Hi Michael,
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. MGED still has rooms for
ontological
improvement. As Larry suggested, we would have a better luck
if we can
work with the MGED consor
ED]; 'Daniel Rubin';
> public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; 'Matthew Cockerill'
> Subject: Re: MGED/FuGO. was: Re: BioRDF [Telcon]: slides for
> the UMLS presentation
>
>
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> Thanks for pointing us to FuGO. To me, it seems like that the F
day, June 06, 2006 9:41 AM
> To: Miller, Michael D (Rosetta)
> Cc: Alan Ruttenberg; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> Subject: Re: MGED/FuGO. was: Re: BioRDF [Telcon]: slides for
> the UMLS presentation
>
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thanks for sharing your thoughts. MGED still h
Hi Alan,
Thanks for pointing us to FuGO. To me, it seems like that the FuGO
community is currently defining an upper ontology that can be
universally used to describe different types of genomic/proteomic
experiments including microarray experiments. There is a draft OWL
version of FuGO (http
ng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 7:54 AM
To: Miller, Michael D (Rosetta)
Cc: Alan Ruttenberg; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: MGED/FuGO. was: Re: BioRDF [Telcon]: slides for
the UMLS presentation
Hi Michael et al,
Is there a converter available which can tak
Larry,
Thanks for the clarification. I agree that it would be great to have an
OWL version of MGED-ML (at least for experimental descriptions)
Best,
-Kei
Larry Hunter wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 10:54 -0400, kei cheung wrote:
Hi Michael et al,
Is there a converter available which ca
cheers,
Michael
> -Original Message-
> From: kei cheung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 7:54 AM
> To: Miller, Michael D (Rosetta)
> Cc: Alan Ruttenberg; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> Subject: Re: MGED/FuGO. was: Re: BioRDF [Telcon]: slides for
> the UM
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 10:54 -0400, kei cheung wrote:
> Hi Michael et al,
>
> Is there a converter available which can take existing datasets in
> mage-ml format and convert them into mged-owl format?
These are two different things. An MAGE-ML dataset describes gene
chips, hybridizations to the
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Alan Ruttenberg
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 6:40 AM
To: kc28
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Daniel Rubin';
public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; 'Matthew Cockerill'
Subject: MGED/FuGO. was: Re: BioRDF [Telcon]: slides for the
UMLS
in';
> public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; 'Matthew Cockerill'
> Subject: MGED/FuGO. was: Re: BioRDF [Telcon]: slides for the
> UMLS presentation
>
>
>
> On Jun 5, 2006, at 9:15 PM, kc28 wrote:
>
> > It might be time to think about how to convert mged ont
On Jun 5, 2006, at 9:15 PM, kc28 wrote:
It might be time to think about how to convert mged ontology or
mage-ml into RDF/OWL. The following are two related articles:
http://www.nature.com/msb/journal/v2/n1/full/msb4100052.html
http://www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v23/n9/full/nbt0905-1095.html
C
14 matches
Mail list logo
