Hi Frank,
Thanks for the comments, and sorry for the accidentally delayed reply.
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 10:32 -0500, Frank Manola wrote:
> David--
>
> A few quick comments below.
>
> On Jan 15, 2013, at 9:34 AM, David Booth wrote:
>
> > Hi, and thanks for your comments!
> >
> > On Tue, 2013-01
nt: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 3:19 PM
To: Michael Miller
Cc: Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C]; David Booth; public-semweb-lifesci
Subject: Re: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
Exchange Language of Healthcare
Good to see this change. Will this make RIM more usable?
--Sivara
..@mail.nih.gov]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 10:01 AM
>> To: Michael Miller
>> Cc: David Booth; public-semweb-lifesci
>> Subject: RE: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
>> Exchange Language of Healthcare
>>
>> Hi Michael --
ust finishing the documentation.
>
> charlie
>
> From: Michael Miller [michael.mil...@systemsbiology.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 10:52 AM
> To: Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C]
> Cc: David Booth; public-semweb-lifesci
> Subject: RE: Opening Walle
...@systemsbiology.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 10:52 AM
To: Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C]
Cc: David Booth; public-semweb-lifesci
Subject: RE: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
Exchange Language of Healthcare
hi charlie,
and is OWL able to capture everything about the MIF so
manticidentity.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 11:48 PM
> To: Tom Morris; public-semweb-lifesci
> Cc: David Booth; RebholzSchuhmann; Joanne Luciano; Michel Dumontier;
> Conor Dowling; Rafael Richards
> Subject: Re: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 6:05 AM
To: Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C]
Cc: Tom Morris; public-semweb-lifesci; David Booth; RebholzSchuhmann; Joanne
Luciano; Michel Dumontier; Conor Dowling; Rafael Richards
Subject: Re: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
Exchange Langua
On 16 Jan 2013, at 16:08, "Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C]"
wrote:
> HL7 has just completed its first version of the entire MIF -- RIM + data
> types + vocabulary -- in OWL
Great..any chance that someone will tell us where it is ? ;-)
Cheers...
Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
http://semant
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C] <
mea...@mail.nih.gov> wrote:
> . Other activities on the radar are representation of all existing
> RIM-derived artifacts -- e.g. RMIMs and CDA templates -- in OWL. There is
> definitely movement.
+1
m.
--
Michel Dumontier
Asso
-semweb-lifesci
Cc: David Booth; RebholzSchuhmann; Joanne Luciano; Michel Dumontier; Conor
Dowling; Rafael Richards
Subject: Re: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
Exchange Language of Healthcare
On 16 Jan 2013, at 02:24, Tom Morris wrote:
> I think the argument would
On 16 Jan 2013, at 02:24, Tom Morris wrote:
> I think the argument would be greatly strengthened by proof points to
> support the claims. They don't need to be long and elaborate.
The best real-world example would be the BBC's Olympic Games system that used
RDF [1].
I think the Response pape
Jerven from uniprot has a paper (accepted? Not sure... At least submitted - he
sent me the submission) where he details how RDF has made his life much much
easier... It may be worth knocking on his door for additional comment at
least...
M
Tom Morris wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:41
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:41 PM, David Booth wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 11:24 -0500, Tom Morris wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:34 AM, David Booth wrote:
> [ . . . ]
>> > Yes, we decided that we simply didn't have time to write a long document
>> > that more fully explained t
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Kingsley Idehen
wrote:
> On 1/15/13 11:06 AM, Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C] wrote:
>>
>> The first version of the HL7 MIF in OWL is now available for comment,
>> criticism, evolution, and usage.
>
> Do you have URL from which the OWL rendition can be accessed?
Perh
Hi Tom,
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 11:24 -0500, Tom Morris wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:34 AM, David Booth wrote:
[ . . . ]
> > Yes, we decided that we simply didn't have time to write a long document
> > that more fully explained the benefits [of RDF].
>
> I think the argument would be greatly
On 1/15/13 11:06 AM, Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C] wrote:
The first version of the HL7 MIF in OWL is now available for comment,
criticism, evolution, and usage.
Do you have URL from which the OWL rendition can be accessed?
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company We
ow available for comment,
> criticism, evolution, and usage.
Excellent!
David
>
> charlie
>
> From: Sivaram Arabandi, MD [sivaram.araba...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:03 AM
> To: RebholzSchuhmann
> Cc: Joanne Luciano; David Booth; public-semweb-lifesc
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:34 AM, David Booth wrote:
> Hi, and thanks for your comments!
>
> On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 12:58 +, RebholzSchuhmann wrote:
>>
>> don't know how someone reads this, who does not know all these benefits
>> anyways. Reads as if you are selling RDF to somebody who knows hal
Hi Sivaram,
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 09:03 -0600, Sivaram Arabandi, MD wrote:
> Agree with this and want to add one more - this statement from the document:
> "Meaningful Use currently mandates a patchwork of idiosyncratic
> formats, such as HL7, CCD/ C32, CCR, NCPDP SCRIPT, C-CDA and QRDA.
> W
lic-semweb-lifesci; Michel Dumontier; Conor
Dowling; Rafael Richards
Subject: Re: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
Exchange Language of Healthcare
Agree with this and want to add one more - this statement from the document:
"Meaningful Use currently mandat
David--
A few quick comments below.
On Jan 15, 2013, at 9:34 AM, David Booth wrote:
> Hi, and thanks for your comments!
>
> On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 12:58 +, RebholzSchuhmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> don't know how someone reads this, who does not know all these benefits
>> anyways. Reads as if y
mail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 4:41 AM
> To: David Booth
> Cc: public-semweb-lifesci; Michel Dumontier; Conor Dowling; Rafael
Richards
> Subject: Re: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
> Exchange Language of Healthcare
>
> Thanks for doing t
Agree with this and want to add one more - this statement from the document:
"Meaningful Use currently mandates a patchwork of idiosyncratic
formats, such as HL7, CCD/ C32, CCR, NCPDP SCRIPT, C-CDA and QRDA. While such
formats provide a degree of machine processability, in comparison, RDF
Hi, and thanks for your comments!
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 12:58 +, RebholzSchuhmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> don't know how someone reads this, who does not know all these benefits
> anyways. Reads as if you are selling RDF to somebody who knows half-way
> the benefits of RDF.
Yes, we decided that w
Hi,
don't know how someone reads this, who does not know all these benefits
anyways. Reads as if you are selling RDF to somebody who knows half-way
the benefits of RDF.
It would have made sense to be more precise on the privacy and security
issues. Neither RDF nor XML have been developed to ad
25 matches
Mail list logo
