Michael Hucka wrote:
SS> Hi Mike, It's good to hear from you.
SS> Would you be interested in having a call to discuss
SS> the various options?
Hi Susie,
Good to hear from you too! It's been a while :-).
A call (I presume a group call?) sounds like a good idea.
What kind of time frame do
SS> Hi Mike, It's good to hear from you.
SS> Would you be interested in having a call to discuss
SS> the various options?
Hi Susie,
Good to hear from you too! It's been a while :-).
A call (I presume a group call?) sounds like a good idea.
What kind of time frame do you have in mind? I'd
Hi Mike,
It's good to hear from you.
Would you be interested in having a call to discuss the various options?
Cheers,
Susie
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Bijan Parsia
wrote:
> On 17 May 2009, at 20:07, Michael Hucka wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> OK, I understand now. I'm happy to start here, then.
On 17 May 2009, at 20:07, Michael Hucka wrote:
[snip]
OK, I understand now. I'm happy to start here, then.
mhucka> Indeed. Standardization of SBML has been discussed
mhucka> over many years in the SBML community,
bparsia>
bparsia> Pointers?
Probably the earliest mention with a record onli
Hi Bijan, and others,
The following are some replies to parts of multiple separate
messages, all put here in one place to (hopefully) make
reading easier:
bparsia> MIchael, there's no question in my mind that
bparsia> HCLSIG is a perfectly find venue to discuss SBML
bparsia> and do HCLSIG s
Hello Bijan, All,
The sympathy might not come across as intended if you throw such
weighty issues as rechartering at newcomers.
The rhetorical question was not intended as a blow, but to elicit
some more information on what makes a thing substantially worthy of
standardization. I was hop
On 13 May 2009, at 11:21, Bijan Parsia wrote:
[snip]
And, to be clear, I'm not always (or typically) very good at the
political side in practice because I'm (as should be evident) a
grouchy person.
To try to summarize constructively, Michael:
HCLSIG cannot, itself, standardize SBML
On 13 May 2009, at 10:48, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
Hello Bijan, Michael, All,
The group does not deliver standards, but can submit something for
consideration to W3C.
Hence my care in distinguishing what the group can and cannot do.
I remember this being discussed indetail in one
o
Hello Bijan, Michael, All,
The group does not deliver standards, but can submit something for
consideration to W3C. I remember this being discussed indetail in one
of the phone conferences.
If SBML is not deserving of being a standard, the what is? Something
no one uses?
Take care
On 13 May 2009, at 03:12, Michael Hucka wrote:
Hi,
I hope this is not too off-topic -- I'm new to this
group and still am trying to get a sense for what it's
about.
bparsia> The way to figure out it's formal scope is to
bparsia> read the charter:
bparsia> http://www.w3.org/2008/05/HCLSIGC
On 13 May 2009, at 03:23, Michael Hucka wrote:
Hi Oliver,
Thanks for your reply.
[snip]
In the context of HCLSIG's charter, it might be interesting
to bring up the fact that SBML tries to be very supportive
of annotations and semantic web technologies. (I know
Oliver is aware of the followin
Hi Oliver,
Thanks for your reply.
curoli> You just have to allow some time for people here
curoli> to get familiar with SBML, and to navigate the
curoli> buerocracy.
OK. What would be the best way to help that along?
curoli> Systems Biology is a central theme in the HCLSIG,
curoli> a
Hi,
>> I hope this is not too off-topic -- I'm new to this
>> group and still am trying to get a sense for what it's
>> about.
bparsia> The way to figure out it's formal scope is to
bparsia> read the charter:
bparsia> http://www.w3.org/2008/05/HCLSIGCharter
In fact, I did that before
Hello Michael,
I would say you have come to the right place. Great to have you here.
SBML is a mature and widely adopted format that is more than worthy
to be submitted as a interest group recommendation (if "interest group
recommendation" is the right term).
You just have to allow so
Hi Michael,
On 12 May 2009, at 07:22, Michael Hucka wrote:
Hello there,
I hope this is not too off-topic -- I'm new to this group
and still am trying to get a sense for what it's about.
The way to figure out it's formal scope is to read the charter:
http://www.w3.org/2008/05/HCLSIGCharter
Hello there,
I hope this is not too off-topic -- I'm new to this group
and still am trying to get a sense for what it's about.
Those of us working on SBML (the Systems Biology Markup
Language -- see http://sbml.org) would like to pursue
standards-body recognition of SBML. Would this (HCLSIG) be
16 matches
Mail list logo
