> From: Jonathan Rees
> [ . . . ]
> 4. Make sure everyone understands the conceptual framework, and gets a
>chance to critique JAR's approach of descriptions, documents,
>versions, access, etc.
Thanks for the meeting notes. I wish I had been able to attend, but I
was traveling.
What d
Bill & all
your attachments exceeded the mailing list size limits. I have put the
two attachments on the web instead:
http://www.w3.org/2007/07/purl_IRIs.pdf
http://www.w3.org/2007/07/purl_IRIs.svg
Ivan
William Bug wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a quick question related to this issue.
>
> We'd
I've added your notes to the wiki.
Cheers,
Susie
On 7/20/07, Jonathan Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here are my notes on Monday's meeting. [Bracketed] phrases are my
after-the-fact clarifications and don't necessarily reflect anything
that happened at the meeting.
This should go into t
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Rees
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 10:40 AM
To: Susie M Stephens
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: BioRDF Informal F2F
Here are my notes on Monday's meeting. [Bracketed] phrases are my
afte
Here are my notes on Monday's meeting. [Bracketed] phrases are my
after-the-fact clarifications and don't necessarily reflect anything
that happened at the meeting.
This should go into the wiki, but I'm too busy to do the formatting
right now, and I will probably forget later. If someone else d
The editor proposes the following agenda:
1. Review reasons for putting effort into this project
2. Review objectives and target audience
3. Discuss process (consensus and closure)
4. JAR's proposals, see
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/URI_Best_Practices/Recommendations/Dra
