Hi all again. Last week we had some good idea exchange about what we
should put into the next HCLSIG charter, i.e. what we tell the world
we are doing. We agreed that we weren't done and that we'd like to
meet in one week. I invite all to meet tomorrow, Thursday 2 June.
Details at the bottom of the
Hi;
On or., 2011.eko mairen 27a 08:35, Andrea Splendiani wrote:
Hi,
long thread... I'm answering to this post, but I have read through it down
(at least to some point, I'm offline now).
two things:
- as for marketing and engagement of outside community, I'm not sure having
technological-orien
Hi,
long thread... I'm answering to this post, but I have read through it down
(at least to some point, I'm offline now).
two things:
- as for marketing and engagement of outside community, I'm not sure having
technological-oriented task forces is that bad. Sure BioRDF and LODD are
confusing, be
Hi,
long thread... I'm answering to this post, but I have read through it down
(at least to some point, I'm offline now).
two things:
- as for marketing and engagement of outside community, I'm not sure having
technological-oriented task forces is that bad. Sure BioRDF and LODD are
confusing, be
> * I included all basic sciences in this category inc. environmental science
> (unless it pertains to health, then it falls into translational).
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rafael Richards [mailto:rafaelricha...@jhu.edu]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 11:45
jhu.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 11:45 AM
> To: Michel_Dumontier
> Cc: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> Subject: Re: HCLS chartering/next steps Thur 26 May
>
> Michel,
>
> I concur. As the overwhelming emphasis of the HCLS is in the lifesciences
> (biology, basic res
wald
> Cc: Tim Clark; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
> Subject: Re: HCLS chartering/next steps Thur 26 May
>
> On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 16:43 +0200, Matthias Samwald wrote:
> > I agree with Tim's ideas. The different task forces should be
> > problem-focused. This would a
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 16:43 +0200, Matthias Samwald wrote:
> I agree with Tim's ideas. The different task forces should be
> problem-focused. This would also help to reduce the redundancy between
> task forces (for example, the original idea of BioRDF was mainly to
> convert biomedical data to RDF,
lem space gives us a lot to work
on.
cheers,
michael
*From:* Tim Clark [mailto:twcl...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
*Sent:* Thursday, May 26, 2011 8:56 AM
*To:* Michael Miller
*Cc:* HCLS IG
*Subject:* Re: HCLS chartering/next steps Thur 26 May
HI Michael,
As I said, problem focused activitie
Agree - again, same as I said in remarks to Michael Miller.
On May 26, 2011, at 11:51 AM, M. Scott Marshall wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> I agree with the principle. Just want to point out that the
> Terminology task force has been looking at a very specific problem -
> detecting discrepancies between
w3.org
> [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Helena Deus
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 7:45 AM
> To: Joanne Luciano
> Cc: Tim Clark; HCLS IG; Mikel Egaña Aranguren
> Subject: Re: HCLS chartering/next steps Thur 26 May
>
> Hi all,
>
> I agree wi
Hi Tim,
I agree with the principle. Just want to point out that the
Terminology task force has been looking at a very specific problem -
detecting discrepancies between clinical reports from radiology and
pathology:
http://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLSIG/Terminology/PathRadCorrelation
The main problem pro
.
cheers,
michael
*From:* public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org [mailto:
public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org] *On Behalf Of *Helena Deus
*Sent:* Thursday, May 26, 2011 7:45 AM
*To:* Joanne Luciano
*Cc:* Tim Clark; HCLS IG; Mikel Egaña Aranguren
*Subject:* Re: HCLS chartering/next steps Thur 26 May
as Samwald
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 10:43 AM
To: Tim Clark; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Subject: Re: HCLS chartering/next steps Thur 26 May
I agree with Tim's ideas. The different task forces should be problem-focused.
This would also help to reduce the redundancy between task forces (fo
other task forces such as
LODD).
- Matthias
From: Tim Clark
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 3:55 PM
To: HCLS IG
Cc: Mikel Egaña Aranguren ; Helena Deus
Subject: Re: HCLS chartering/next steps Thur 26 May
Dear HCLS colleagues
I guess my comment would be, setting Translational Medicine as a
Hi all,
I agree with a focus on creating "problem-centric" task forces - to be
honest, I always felt bioRDF to be a problem-centered group (i.e. trying to
solve a current problem in life sciences, not looking for a problem given a
solution).
I do believe, however, that we need to make sure that w
Beyond the target areas, do we have any guidelines on the skill sets
that are for a project to proceed / succeed.
How much clinical knowledge is required from the team to facilitate a
meaningful contribution to clinical practice
based on a robust semantic implementation. Likewise what amount of
kno
Tim,
Thanks for your thoughts. I agree with you and would like to add an evaluation
criteria component - these efforts (imo) should be targeted at having an impact
on clinical outcome.
Joanne
~~
Joanne S. Luciano, PhD
On Thu, 26 May 2011 06:55:07 -0700, Tim Clark
wrote:
I would lose the solution-based Task Groups and reformulate them as
problem-based.
for example, BioRDF has been working on gene lists for transcriptomic
experiments, we might recharter that Task Group to work on Genomic
Experiments
Hi,
I guess my comment would be, setting Translational Medicine as a major
priority = ok, making it the only priority = not ok.
+1
My personal recommendation would be to formulate the charter around
accelerating biomedical research and promoting cross-discipline
sharing, across the full
Tim,
Thanks for your thoughts. I agree with you and would like to add an evaluation
criteria component - these efforts (imo) should be targeted at having an impact
on clinical outcome.
Joanne
On May 26, 2011, at 9:55 AM, Tim Clark wrote:
> Dear HCLS colleagues
>
> I guess my comment would be
-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tim Clark
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 9:55 AM
To: HCLS IG
Cc: Mikel Egaña Aranguren; Helena Deus
Subject: Re: HCLS chartering/next steps Thur 26 May
Dear HCLS colleagues
I guess my comment would be, setting
Dear HCLS colleagues
I guess my comment would be, setting Translational Medicine as a major priority
= ok, making it the only priority = not ok.
TM applications are important, and do potentially integrate many of the things
we have all been working on. But they are far from covering all the b
I'm not sure we need a different IG.
If the focus is integration of data... environment and health are far... but
in theory not that far...
ciao,
Andrea
Il giorno 26/mag/2011, alle ore 14.31, Helena Deus ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> That is a very good point, thanks Mikel and Andrea!
> Do you have poin
Hi,
That is a very good point, thanks Mikel and Andrea!
Do you have pointers to such type of data? Shall we consider an IG for
"basic" life sciences?
The LS part of HCLS has indeed been gaining adepts rapidly and it may make
sense to reflect that in the charter.
Cheers,
Lena
2011/5/26 Mikel Ega
Hi;
I should attend the conference call but I just want to add that I concur
with Andrea in that the HCLS IG should consider the environmental realm,
since loads of new ecological/environment data, with new challenges to
be addressed, are waiting to be represented semantically. That's
precise
Hi,
I see myself as more involved in the next incarnation of the charter ;)
Unfortunately, today is a travel day and I cannot attend the conference
call.
I have two questions/ideas, which don't really map to the current
sub-groups, but just in case they ring some bell:
-) Is the HCLS exclusively
Hi Eric,
Sorry I won't be able to make the call either. It conflicts with
provenance WG's weekly call. But I will keep an eye on the IRC.
On 24/05/2011 04:04, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
LODD - curation of compounds, clinical trials and outcomes.
I am a bit surprised to see this wording
hi eric,
thanks for all your hard work, it lets people like me nitpick from the
corners. sorry i won't be able to make the teleconference. comments
below.
> Terminology - identifying and integrating identifiers for biological
> processes, gross anatomy and medical procedures to promote
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
