Hi Hans,
(Apologies for dropping this earlier! :( But I'm glad that I noticed
it now!)
I'm delighted to hear of your interest in contributing to the FHIR
ontology. I've added you as one of the champions for that effort.
I'm not personally familiar with the work done on formalization of C
c Prud'hommeaux
Subject: Re: Proposed agenda for Nov 4 HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup call
Hi David,
I can contribute to the FHIR ontology and the ICD-11/ SNOMED.
Are you familiar with the work done on formalization of CDISC standards in
Roche?
Kind regards,
Hans
On 02 Nov 2014, at 03:12, David Booth
Hi David,
I can contribute to the FHIR ontology and the ICD-11/ SNOMED.
Are you familiar with the work done on formalization of CDISC standards in
Roche?
Kind regards,
Hans
On 02 Nov 2014, at 03:12, David Booth wrote:
> Our first HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup call (jointly with W3C HCLS COI group) w
* David Booth [2014-11-01 22:12-0400]
> Our first HL7 ITS RDF Subgroup call (jointly with W3C HCLS COI
> group) will be Nov 4. Unfortunately I will be unable to join this
> call because I will be flying. :( Nonetheless, here are my
> suggested agenda:
>
> 1. Remaining Logistics
>
> Meeti
I am wondering whether there should not be a work topic to cover high level
concept mapping to RDF.
Examples of this could be how are Coded Terms (e.g. ICD11 and SNOMED CT) and
Relationships (e.g. Act Role Participation) represented.
This could be influenced by what approaches are already taken
