Re: SfN meeting submission

2007-05-05 Thread jbarkley
I agree as well. jb Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 05:35:20 -0400 From: William Bug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: public-semweb-lifesci hcls Subject: Re: SfN meeting submission Quoting William Bug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I agree completely, Kei. > > Don - do you want me to se

Re: SfN meeting submission

2007-05-04 Thread Kei Cheung
L PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi don, Works for me as well, and I'll be glad to help anyway I can. thanks, jb Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:00:09 -0400 From: William Bug <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> To: public-semweb-lifesci hcls <ma

Re: SfN meeting submission

2007-05-04 Thread Kei Cheung
for me as well, and I'll be glad to help anyway I can. thanks, jb Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:00:09 -0400 From: William Bug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: public-semweb-lifesci hcls Subject: Re: SfN meeting submission Quoting William Bug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Don, This

Re: SfN meeting submission

2007-05-04 Thread jbarkley
hi don, Works for me as well, and I'll be glad to help anyway I can. thanks, jb Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 17:00:09 -0400 From: William Bug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: public-semweb-lifesci hcls Subject: Re: SfN meeting submission Quoting William Bug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: &g

Re: SfN meeting submission

2007-05-03 Thread Mark Montgomery
fesci hcls Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 2:00 PM Subject: Re: SfN meeting submission Hi Don, This works for me. In regards to the suggestion Mark made, I think some of his suggestions sound very practical. I'd be glad to participate - or not - depending on the need and intend

Re: SfN meeting submission

2007-05-03 Thread Mark Montgomery
; Cc: "'public-semweb-lifesci hcls'" Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 10:06 AM Subject: RE: SfN meeting submission Here's my proposal: I write a quick rough draft and send a copy to all interested parties. People actually contributing to the writing should mostly be neurosc

RE: SfN meeting submission

2007-05-03 Thread Donald Doherty
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 12:19 PM To: William Bug Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls Subject: Re: SfN meeting submission Hi Bill et al., I agree that it's important to make our SW/Neuro demo visible to the neuroscience community. For example, I have asked Gordon Shepherd (PI of SenseLab) t

Re: SfN meeting submission

2007-05-03 Thread Kei Cheung
Hi Bill et al., I agree that it's important to make our SW/Neuro demo visible to the neuroscience community. For example, I have asked Gordon Shepherd (PI of SenseLab) to look at the AD use case written by June, Gwen, et al to see if any comments/suggestions can be made. It would be great if

Re: SfN meeting submission

2007-05-02 Thread William Bug
Hi Don, Matthias, John, Kei, et al., I too would like to contribute to an SfN abstract in this context. I believe given the domain HCLS IG is covering - neurodegenerative disease - despite the lack of a full, refereed article, this is a very important venue in which to present, in order to h

RE: SfN meeting submission

2007-05-02 Thread Donald Doherty
Hi Matthias, That'd be great! SfN abstracts are brief (max. 2300 characters including punctuation!) so focusing on the value to neuroscientists sounds like the right course. Abstract may be presented or posters. Slide presentations are kept very brief and there is so much going on most people wo