From: binchenindi...@gmail.com [mailto:binchenindi...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
bin chen
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 11:03 AM
To: Bhat, Talapady N.
Cc: Erick Antezana; public-semweb-lifesci; Plant, Anne L. Dr.; Elliott, John T.
Subject: Re: reasoning on gene ontology
Thanks all for the response
t; From: Erick Antezana [mailto:erick.antez...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2012 2:16 AM
> To: Bhat, Talapady N.
> Cc: bin chen; public-semweb-lifesci; Plant, Anne L. Dr.; Elliott, John T.
> Subject: Re: reasoning on gene ontology
>
> Hi,
>
> I would be interested
sci; Plant, Anne L. Dr.; Elliott, John T.
Subject: Re: reasoning on gene ontology
Hi,
I would be interested in the looking at the schema of BIOROOT as well as
knowing a bit more about the technology behing it (lucene? java?
oracle?). On the other hand, do you have any plans to provide some web
nsr>
- Original Message -
*From:* Chris Mungall <mailto:cjmung...@lbl.gov>
*To:* bin chen <mailto:binc...@indiana.edu>
*Cc:* public-semweb-lifesci <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
*Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2012 4:20 PM
*Subject:* Re: r
Hi Bin,
I have been playing around the GO and looking for interesting cases too. I
believe the reasoner could help for the following tasks:
1- Terms retrieval/search, as you pointed out, SW queries are more powerful
and intuitive than relational databases one.
2- Ontology re-factoring: When new
2010.
You can find versions of these papers on my Web site via
http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~stevensr
- Original Message -
From: Chris Mungall
To: bin chen
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: reasoning on gene ontology
Hi Bin,
at, Talapady N.
> Cc: bin chen; public-semweb-lifesci; Plant, Anne L. Dr.; Elliott, John T.
> Subject: Re: reasoning on gene ontology
>
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to get the relational database schema you use? and a database
> dump?
>
> how often do you update your system
Hi,
You may be interested in the system and examples online at the site below.
In particular:
www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/GeneSequenceOntology3.agent
Apologies if you have seen this before, and thanks for comments.
-- Adrian
Interne
factors
for us to decide on this.
Thanks
T N Bhat
-Original Message-
From: Erick Antezana [mailto:erick.antez...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2012 11:43 AM
To: Bhat, Talapady N.
Cc: bin chen; public-semweb-lifesci; Plant, Anne L. Dr.; Elliott, John T.
Subject: Re: reasoning on
Hi,
is it possible to get the relational database schema you use? and a
database dump?
how often do you update your system?
cheers,
Erick
On 6 April 2012 15:29, Bhat, Talapady N. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Because you mentioned about ontology (GO) in the context of relational
> databases I thought you m
Hi Bin,
We use OWL reasoning extensively within the GO consortium, primarily
for automated classification of new terms, and for validation of the
ontology and gene associations. For some more background, see
PMID:20152934 and PMID:20973947 (note that in those papers we used
some custom reasoning t
Hi,
Because you mentioned about ontology (GO) in the context of relational
databases I thought you may be interested in looking into our site where we
incorporated over 99 large ontology into a relational database. Most of these
large ontology were originally obtained from GO.
http://xpdb.nist.g
12 matches
Mail list logo
