Thanks, Matthias. I think this is another nice example of using the HCLS
KB to support integrated neuroscientific queries.
It turns out that I need to attend a meeting at work at 11:30 am so I
can only attend the first 20 minutes of the BioRDF call today.
Happy Holidays,
-Kei
Matthias Sam
Phillip Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Let's be clear. This is NOT an standards issue. As far as I can tell both RFCs
> mentioned tell you WHAT to do. This is good. They do not tell you what you
> should not do; I see no mention of subject lines in either.
There is no standard that I am awa
> "TG" == Ted Guild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TG> I am surprised and sorry that anyone found the page [1] explaining why
TG> we run our lists, and for that matter most of our infrastructure,
TG> according to standards offensive. That was certainly not the intent of
TG> the page, mer
I am surprised and sorry that anyone found the page [1] explaining
why we run our lists, and for that matter most of our infrastructure,
according to standards offensive. That was certainly not the intent
of the page, merely to give a thorough response to a request that has
come up a few times a
* Phillip Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-13 14:04+]
>
> > "PH" == Pat Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Our Systems Team has fielded this request many times.
>
> PH> Its about time it bloody well listened, then.
>
> Yes.
>
> PH> By the way, the tone of the document [1]
> "PH" == Pat Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Our Systems Team has fielded this request many times.
PH> Its about time it bloody well listened, then.
Yes.
PH> By the way, the tone of the document [1] is extremely annoying. If the
PH> W3C were a company taking this attitude, i
At 05:53 PM 11/12/2007 +0100, Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote:
To the maintainers of this list: consider configuring the list so
that messages sent to it have a prefix like [semweb-lifesci]
automatically added to the subject line, as it is often the
practice with other lists. It helps filtering, s
That is one way.
But does compliance with that standard mean you cannot also follow the
defacto standard with respect to modifying the subject. W3C lists are
the only ones which I am on that do things differently in this
respect. I have not checked, but they are possibly the only ones who
have im
At 05:53 PM 11/12/2007 +0100, Wacek Kusnierczyk wrote:
>To the maintainers of this list: consider configuring the list so that
>messages sent to it have a prefix like [semweb-lifesci] automatically added to
>the subject line, as it is often the practice with other lists. It helps
>filtering,
I second this. It would make it much easier. Also, if the default
reply-to address could be set to the list address it would also make
it easier to interact with in my opinion.
Peter
On 13/11/2007, Wacek Kusnierczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To the maintainers of this list: consider config
10 matches
Mail list logo
