Re: Two-step JSON-LD possibility for FHIR [was Re: Proposed RDF FHIR syntax feedback]

2015-03-17 Thread Grahame Grieve
> I don't think an @context can produce any implied triples oh? damn. no, but hang on, if the @context says what resourceType currently says, then surely that information makes it's way into RDF, and you don't need a triple for resource type. I'll illustrate what I'm proposing by taking a nice sh

Two-step JSON-LD possibility for FHIR [was Re: Proposed RDF FHIR syntax feedback]

2015-03-17 Thread David Booth
I had some conversation with Grahame today on the ITS call, and I think I got a clearer idea of what he was suggesting for JSON-LD, which I'll summarize (with some liberties). The basic idea is to allow two forms of JSON: brief and verbose. The brief form would basically be the same as the ex