Re: biontology.org Linked Data URIs?

2013-05-29 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 5/28/13 6:51 PM, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: On May 28, 2013, at 6:23 PM, Kingsley Idehen > wrote: On 5/28/13 5:04 PM, Richard Boyce wrote: I think this helps bioportal keep track of usage (to justify its existence) and reduce annoying bots. Also, I get updates f

Re: biontology.org Linked Data URIs?

2013-05-29 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 5/29/13 2:46 PM, Ray Fergerson wrote: Kingsley, These URI's go to our (NCBO) purl server. Where did you find them? The first (NCIM) refers to a terminology that is not in BioPortal any more (NCI Metathesaurus). That is why you get the 404. The second (MSH) refers to a term in the UMLS Me

Re: biontology.org Linked Data URIs?

2013-05-29 Thread Ray Fergerson
Our NCBO funders, our advisors, and ourselves require that we know who is using our services and what they are doing. IP address is not enough. We need the names of real people and we need their projects. We aren't using APIKEYs to attempt to block bots or to do rate limiting - though we may ev

Re: biontology.org Linked Data URIs?

2013-05-29 Thread Ray Fergerson
Agreed. You do not. BioPortal requires an APIKEY for REST calls but not for any UI display. Ray

Re: biontology.org Linked Data URIs?

2013-05-29 Thread Ray Fergerson
Kingsley, These URI's go to our (NCBO) purl server. Where did you find them? The first (NCIM) refers to a terminology that is not in BioPortal any more (NCI Metathesaurus). That is why you get the 404. The second (MSH) refers to a term in the UMLS MeSH terminology that does resolve afte

Re: biontology.org Linked Data URIs?

2013-05-28 Thread Andrea Splendiani
Il giorno 29/mag/2013, alle ore 01:27, Alan Ruttenberg ha scritto: > > > On Tuesday, May 28, 2013, Andrea Splendiani wrote: > HI, > > perhaps a key makes easier to track usage for someone with whom you have > established a contract (so servers/IPs may vary, but the "key" recorded is > the

Re: biontology.org Linked Data URIs?

2013-05-28 Thread Alan Ruttenberg
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013, Andrea Splendiani wrote: > HI, > > perhaps a key makes easier to track usage for someone with whom you have > established a contract (so servers/IPs may vary, but the "key" recorded is > the same). > I recall no contract offers. I think it's an easy mechanism to pick up

Re: biontology.org Linked Data URIs?

2013-05-28 Thread Andrea Splendiani
HI, perhaps a key makes easier to track usage for someone with whom you have established a contract (so servers/IPs may vary, but the "key" recorded is the same). I think it's an easy mechanism to pick up: if you want to maximize users... this is what any web-developer will do without thinking.

Re: biontology.org Linked Data URIs?

2013-05-28 Thread Alan Ruttenberg
On May 28, 2013, at 6:23 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 5/28/13 5:04 PM, Richard Boyce wrote: >> I think this helps bioportal keep track of usage (to justify its existence) >> and reduce annoying bots. Also, I get updates from bioportal for having >> registered an account. -R > > Bots are an

Re: biontology.org Linked Data URIs?

2013-05-28 Thread Chris Mungall
The OBO library subset of bio-ontologies have URIs that conform to linked data norms. E.g. http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/GO_0006264 - mitochondrial DNA replication http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/CL_617 - GABAergic neuron http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MP_0002766 - situs inversus http://pur

Re: biontology.org Linked Data URIs?

2013-05-28 Thread Jim McCusker
All worthy goals, I have an account myself. But they can track usage through conventional web server logs (including IP address usage) and can restrict annoying bots (as opposed to the non-annoying ones, which they would like to encourage, I would think) by rate-limiting page access. Jim On Tue,

Re: biontology.org Linked Data URIs?

2013-05-28 Thread Richard Boyce
I think this helps bioportal keep track of usage (to justify its existence) and reduce annoying bots. Also, I get updates from bioportal for having registered an account. -R On 05/28/2013 04:54 PM, Jim McCusker wrote: I can see asking for an API key for working with computational resources (li

Re: biontology.org Linked Data URIs?

2013-05-28 Thread Jim McCusker
I can see asking for an API key for working with computational resources (like Annotator and Ontology Recommender), but we don't need an API key to see those classes in HTML, why should we need one to see them in RDF? Jim On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Peter Ansell wrote: > Hi Kingsley, > > I

Re: biontology.org Linked Data URIs?

2013-05-28 Thread Peter Ansell
Hi Kingsley, I think you may need an API key to work with them? [1] Cheers, Peter [1] http://www.bioontology.org/wiki/index.php/NCBO_REST_services On 29 May 2013 05:55, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > All, > > Who are the folks responsible for URIs such as: > > 1. >

biontology.org Linked Data URIs?

2013-05-28 Thread Kingsley Idehen
All, Who are the folks responsible for URIs such as: 1. ? 2. ? I ask due to the following curl output: HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 19:46:48 GMT Server: 1060 NetKern