Re: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-17 Thread Carmel Kent
05:01 PM Subject:Re: semantic web for EHRs Carmel Kent wrote:

Re: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-15 Thread Jim McCusker
m: dan russler [mailto:dan.russ...@oracle.com] >> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 9:19 AM >> To: Kingsley Idehen >> Cc: conor dowling; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; Pan, Tony; Melliyal >> Annamalai >> Subject: Re: semantic web for EHRs >> >> There is interest in

Re: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-15 Thread Kingsley Idehen
Date: 11/03/2010 11:23 AM Subject:semantic web for

Re: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-15 Thread Carmel Kent
3 AM Subject:semantic web for

Re: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-15 Thread dirk . colaert
U/a...@agfa cc conor dowling , public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org Subject Re: semantic web for EHRs dirk.cola...@agfa.com wrote: > > We (Agfa HealthCare) are doing a project on European level around > infectious diseases. We collect data in diffe

Re: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-12 Thread Susie Stephens
Open Vista is listed on the interface page http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG/PharmaOntology/Interface I would have thought it'd be mention in some of the documents too, but maybe just in the minutes from past calls. Susie On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:19 PM, conor dowling wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 20

Re: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-12 Thread conor dowling
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Susie Stephens wrote: > The Translational Medicine Ontology (TMO) task has created some fake > patient data in RDF. We are working to create an interface to that data and > other data that we have in RDF, e.g. pharmacogenomics, side effects, > diagnostics, formula

Re: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-12 Thread Susie Stephens
- >> Click on link to read important disclaimer: >> http://www.agfa.com/healthcare/maildisclaimer >> >> >> *Kingsley Idehen * >> Sent by: public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org >> >> 12/03/2010 14:40 >> >> &

Re: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-12 Thread Kingsley Idehen
er *Kingsley Idehen * Sent by: public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org 12/03/2010 14:40 To conor dowling cc public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org Subject Re: semantic web for EHRs conor dowling wrote: > > > U.S.? (There's little h

RE: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-12 Thread Pathak, Jyotishman, Ph.D.
-semweb-lifesci@w3.org Subject: Re: semantic web for EHRs > Now, on the face of it, such data is meaningless outside this VistA. We >> need a "mapping layer", an "RPC". A "type-mapper". A reformatter. Layers ... >> BUT WE KNOW (on this

Re: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-12 Thread conor dowling
g; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; Pan, Tony; Melliyal > Annamalai > Subject: Re: semantic web for EHRs > > There is interest in using RDF and OWL to support Semantic Web Services > over the NHIN. > > Anyone interested in helping can contact me. > > Dan > > On 3/12/

Re: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-12 Thread conor dowling
> Now, on the face of it, such data is meaningless outside this VistA. We >> need a "mapping layer", an "RPC". A "type-mapper". A reformatter. Layers ... >> BUT WE KNOW (on this group) that it is trival to do something like ... >>:120.51/1 same as -> SNOMED:39257000

Re: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-12 Thread dan russler
There is interest in using RDF and OWL to support Semantic Web Services over the NHIN. Anyone interested in helping can contact me. Dan On 3/12/2010 8:40 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: conor dowling wrote: > U.S.? (There's little here from what I can see - the interoperability push is a

Re: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-12 Thread dirk . colaert
t-Martens-Latem, Belgium http://www.agfa.com/healthcare/ Click on link to read important disclaimer: http://www.agfa.com/healthcare/maildisclaimer Kingsley Idehen Sent by: public-semweb-lifesci-requ...@w3.org 12/03/2010 14:40 To conor dowling cc public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org Subject Re: semant

Re: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-12 Thread Kingsley Idehen
conor dowling wrote: > U.S.? (There's little here from what I can see - the interoperability push is around SOAP). In my view, SOAP is the wrong direction. It is just adds complexity and contributes to "babelization": http://www.w3.org/2003/Talks/0717-semweb-dbooth/slid

Re: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-11 Thread conor dowling
> > U.S.? (There's little here from what I can see - the interoperability > push is around SOAP). > > In my view, SOAP is the wrong direction. It is just adds complexity and > contributes to "babelization": > http://www.w3.org/2003/Talks/0717-semweb-dbooth/slide10-0.html > you're right but here's

Re: semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-11 Thread David Booth
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 15:38 -0800, conor dowling wrote: > Is anyone on the group involved or know about adding a Semantic > Endpoint to an EHR system? I'm working on a SPARQL "profile" called > FMQL (see: http://www.caregraf.org/semanticvista#fmql ) for VA's > VistA, the most widely deployed EMR in

semantic web for EHRs

2010-03-11 Thread conor dowling
Is anyone on the group involved or know about adding a Semantic Endpoint to an EHR system? I'm working on a SPARQL "profile" called FMQL (see: http://www.caregraf.org/semanticvista#fmql ) for VA's VistA, the most widely deployed EMR in the U.S. (and open-sourced to boot). You can see/code-to the cu