Hi Doug,
On Feb 7, 2008, at 2:32 PM, Doug Schepers wrote:
Hi, Anne-
I'm stepping in here to inform on a matter of process. This is not
a judgment on the technical merits of either position.
Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 2/7/08 5:42 AM):
o As per our agreement in the tech plenary the
Doug Schepers wrote:
Moreover, this is, in fact, what this WG was chartered to do regarding XHR:
"This deliverable should begin by documenting the existing
XMLHttpRequest interface."
The question becomes, is IE's implementation to be considered canonical,
or is it up to interpretation vis a
Hi, Anne-
I'm stepping in here to inform on a matter of process. This is not a
judgment on the technical merits of either position.
Anne van Kesteren wrote (on 2/7/08 5:42 AM):
o As per our agreement in the tech plenary the spec will conform to
IE's implementation of XHR (with the exce
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 12:00:48 +0100, Stewart Brodie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have implemented everything in DOM Level 3 events except for event
groups.
I believe those are dropped.
Namespaces are incredibly simple to support.
The question is whether they're worth the additional API
Doug Schepers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, WebAPI fans-
>
> Here are the minutes for the DOM3 Events telcon for 6 Feb 2008. Sorry
> for the funky formatting.
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/02/06-webapi-minutes.html
> [2:47pm] aemmons: CM: I could not find a DOM Level 2 events test
>
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:57:50 +0100, Sunava Dutta
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
o This spec is very different from existing HTML/CSS/DOM spec where
the functionality/API specification is the focus. This spec talks about
interface specification as well as a lot of details that appear to be
