make sense to me. I raised ISSUE-3 to remind me (since it
requires thinking, right now is not when I will figure it out)
Cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try
or
non-normative. And numbering the chapters would be great
too.
I agree, and will do both of these for or before the next public draft.
cheers and thanks for the comments
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http:
d there are existing
implementations using it, so it seemed sensible to keep the names stable.
This is issue 119 [1] in the webapi tracker
[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/webapi/track/issues/119
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- ha
webapi/2008May/0349.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapi/2008May/0478.html
Yep. Thanks for the various comments, by the way. It's nice to have the
feedback ;)
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
e to
send mail, which was perhaps an unluckily sub-optimal choice.
Happy birthday!
Thanks ;)
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 23:01:28 +0200, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>
> Could you please confirm that it is acceptable for us to begin
> unofficially discussing geolocation API requirements on the
> public-webapi@w3.or
was perhaps an unluckily sub-optimal choice.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
lso have appreciated the request coming in well before the deadline,
ideally with some explanation...)
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
ng the spec relatively quickly. Personally I
think it seems better to go with what we have right now, and look at
adding more in a seperate piece of work, so as to stabilise and finish the
spec...
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle frança
from
the proposed charter for Web Apps.
Cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
On Wed, 07 May 2008 15:39:01 +0200, Charles McCathieNevile
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Opera has a proposal for a specification that would revive (and
supersede) the file upload API that has been lingering so long as a
work item.
...
A draft is at http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/
equested - there is certainly no barrier to holding
telconferences before the meeting.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
time we want to hand around a Terabyte in a web application, that we
will have seriously failed somewhere. Although it isn't impossible that we
end up there).
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer no
iously seperate the two as
ideas in any proposal. They have (IMHO) slightly different use cases.
Cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
On Tue, 13 May 2008 02:54:58 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2008 18:48:27 +0200, Jean-Yves Bitterlich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I understood that prio 1 item on the july 1st-3rd agenda is going to
Cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
to go if we decide to take this on. The
proposal is currently a small spec for one thing, after all.
Do we have the resources to have someone champion this spec?
Are you asking the WG, or Google?
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle frança
On Wed, 07 May 2008 16:47:06 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On May 7, 2008, at 6:39 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
Hi folks,
Opera has a proposal for a specification that would revive (and
supersede)
the file upload API that has been lingering so lon
...
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
r statement of Microsoft's position
in written form ahead of the telecon. By their nature, these are
issues that need careful analysis, and cannot be evaluated fully in
the context of a teleconference.
Regards,
Maciej
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je pa
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 00:16:30 +0800, Charles McCathieNevile
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Microsoft has suggested [1] that the WebAPI group take on the XDR spec
as a deliverable
We will therefore hold a survey of Working Group members, to determine
how much support there is fo
forward.
[1]
http://www.w3.org/mid/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cheers
Chaals (chair of WebAPI)
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
ke to propose XDR as a new (Rec-track) spec for the Web API
WG.
Whatever you decide to do, please could you choose a different acronym,
as XDR is already used for encoding in RPC.
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:46:54 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Would be great. If W3C grants us a charter extension we can republish -
Oops. As Cam pointed out to me privately, our charter runs to the end of
April, which is enough time to republish. (It just
us.
(For folks following this public list, that's a formal administrative
thing for working group members. I would be surprised if it didn't pass -
I don't think we have ever blocked publication of an updated working
draft).
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera
ents_Agenda
Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:31:42 +0100, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/progress/Progress.html?rev=1.20
is a new Editor's draft, which should be ready to publish as a Working
orted, please let me know...
Otherwise, enjoy...
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
, open:
http://peepo.co.uk/temp/use-external.svg
copy, paste and save the sun symbol:
xlink:href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/
5/50/Weather-icons.svg#sunny" />
in a new document then open in Opera 9.5
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Gro
w3.org/TR/2008/WD-css3-namespace-20080215
Bert
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:28:46 +0100, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:01:30 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
working through the first test case I looked at, sections of the
document seem to be quite large. I believe
spec.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
008 12:18 PM
To: Charles McCathieNevile; Sunava Dutta; Chris Wilson
Cc: public-webapi@w3.org; Gideon Cohn; Zhenbin Xu; Marc Silbey; Ahmed
Kamel
Subject: Re: IE Team's Feedback on the XHR Draft
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 11:37:17 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wou
he testsuite is not complete.
As I noted, please don't expect Anne to write the entire test suite - that
isn't his job. We expect the participants of the working group in
particular to contribute tests - although they are welcome from anyone...
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNe
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:21:25 +0530, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:38:16 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suggest we declare this test invalid, and either replace it and
declare it valid only after such date as
nseXML) is not one
of the tests failed by a lot of browsers, I suspect the issue will go
away, but I haven't actually run the tests on other browsers yet. So I
suggest there is no real issue here, just an incorrect test.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standar
a.com/apis/XMLHttpRequest/setRequestHeader/021.htm
http://tc.labs.opera.com/apis/XMLHttpRequest/setRequestHeader/001.htm
http://tc.labs.opera.com/apis/XMLHttpRequest/complex/001.htm
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer
ad BAR").
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 06:21:18 +0530, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Feb 8, 2008, at 12:03 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 22:22:59 +0530, Chris Wilson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2) In fact, on that note, we're interested to see
or implementation, and in practice, this is when most comments are made.
Thus, I see little harm in advancing to LC, since you will still have an
opportunity to submit additional technical comments.
[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr
Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG, CDF, an
copy/paste into an XHTML *or* HTML document and have it work.
As far as I know the group has never resolved a particular preference for
terse HTML markup over XHTML. Does anyone think that the value of such a
resolution would justify the debate it will entail?
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McC
to do anything (on past form this suggests a couple
of months hiatus although I hope we manage not to do that this time). So
please try to get your reviews done early.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-selectors-api-20071221/
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards
Stripped the issue marker, this seems more about general process.
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:14:16 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:54:49 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ce in this case to maintain compatibility
with what we have had for a couple of years or so.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
er of bytes of the content
transferred in the operation.
Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
Anne opined, a while ago, that these two attributes should have names
more closely related. In my request for further information, nobody
said they had any great reason for keeping the current names.
I therefo
.
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-webapi/2007Jul/0020.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-webapi/2007Jul/0021.html
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals
crosoft are welcome to maintain a formal
objection which will be carried along with the spec through further
progress until resolved higher up the W3C process hierarchy.
cheers
chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer
e" to "totalKnown". Any objections?
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals Try the Kestrel - Opera 9.5 alpha
I propose to close ISSUE-117 by not including a stalled event.
See below for some more history...
cheers
A while ago, Hixie wrote...
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
Maciej volunteered that
> Somebody pointed out> > * HTML 5 has an event called "st
change the spec and let is say what Cameron suggests (i.e. to
clarify the current difference between Progress and D3E in line with how
Progress says it should be clarified),and thus to close this issue.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 08:58:34 +0200, Charles McCathieNevile
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:35:47 +0200, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I think it would be good if we published another draft of XMLHttpRequest
Agreed. This is therefor
HttpRequest/Overview.src.html.diff?r1=1.120&r2=1.146&f=h
The latest editor draft can be found here:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/XMLHttpRequest/
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group
je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://
however we're going to translate that into
specification terminology) says it's done.
Makes sense to me too.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snapshot.opera.com - Kestrel (9.5α1)
webapi/track/issues/33 - ISSUE-33. At the moment we
don't have any resources in the group to work on it :(
Cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://snapshot.opera.com - Kestrel (9.5α1)
tion showImage(imageHref) {
...
// remove the progress bar when done.
image.addEventListener("load", hideProgressBar, false);
image.addEventListener("error", hideProgressBar, false);
image.addEventListener("abort", hideProgressBar, false);
}
=
, Team contact, SYMM Working Group.
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Catch up: Speed Dial http://opera.com
mespace, however I haven't yet checked how this works when e.g.
replacing the root element or when creating new documents with DOM
methods. This would need to be defined.
I realise that moving members to Document and Element means changing DOM
Core, so coordination with the WebAPI WG wou
getElementBySelector()/getElementListBySelector() scored 43
The rest weren't really in the race, relatively speaking.
Cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Catch up: Speed Dial http://opera.com
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:52:47 +0200, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Currently reads "The progress event". This is probably not
intended. Also, the URI for "Latest W3C Working Draft" misses a dot
between w3 and org.
Oops. Both fixed - thanks.
ch
oint out to HTML-WG that
3 seconds is very arbitrary). This would be consistent with how we dealt
with ISSUE-107...
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Catch up: Speed Dial http://opera.com
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:20:23 +0200, Charles McCathieNevile
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:04:05 +0200, Innovimax SARL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
In
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/network-api/network-api.html?rev=1.2&content-type=text
lish a new editors' draft in a few minutes with these
corrections made...
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Catch up: Speed Dial http://opera.com
ave stuff missing, but don't be
afraid to point out problems or errors.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Catch up: Speed Dial http://opera.com
d that!
Even obtaining the metrics would be nice.
Moreover, knowing if an installed font does have glyph-x or glyph-y
(note: a unicode range availability is useless) should be.
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMA
it a Last Call draft 3 weeks later.
(There will be a new call for consensus on the last call draft, if you
really can't live with the names and have a better idea that can get
consensus).
Cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español -
r that to not publishing.
Cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Catch up: Speed Dial http://opera.com
for new names.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Catch up: Speed Dial http://opera.com
ith the names
Lachy proposed in his draft, or are you just tossing in another idea in
case it gets stronger consensus?
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Catch up: Speed Dial http://opera.com
nsus.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Catch up: Speed Dial http://opera.com
n failure, and I hope that you
understand the process that got us here and can live with the names...
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Catch up: Speed Dial http://opera.com
x27;t
suffered that problem, and hopeful that this will allow us to proceed -
less than six months (!) after all the substantive issues seem to have
been settled...
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lær
d wording reads more clearly in english
than the alternatives I have seen so far.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Catch up: Speed Dial http://opera.com
y (so user agent developers understand why
they should "very carefully consider" implementing these requirements...).
The second requirement, I think, is a socket interface.
Any more?
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je pa
orming the user that a transaction is in
progress there are lots of drawbacks to canceling that and no clear benefit to
justify keeping it cancelable.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:28:26 +0200, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:36:30 +0200, Charles McCathieNevile
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ian suggested that there should be a required frequency for progress
>> events, and t
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Try Opera 9.1 http://opera.com
de how they do this.
I propose we put a SHOULD in the section "using this with other specifications"
saying that to meet common user expectations, header information should be left
out in such cases as downloading a file via HTTP.
Cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Ope
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Try Opera 9.1 http://opera.com
ke it clear
that it just inherits from initEvent (noted as an issue in the spec). Will be
fixed as soon as I copy/paste correctly...
Cheers and thanks for picking this up.
Chaals
> Cheers,
> Jean-Yves
>
> Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> h
haals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Try Opera 9.1 http://opera.com
sed in this
> thread.)
Yep, thanks. As an editorial amendment you could clarify how long it has to
persist (not until the heat death of the universe, right?). But this seems
clear to me now.
cheers
chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Try Opera 9.1 http://opera.com
Comments forwarded with permission... answers inline below
--- Forwarded message ---
From: "Ellen Siegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jean-Y
ked.
(That's still kind of involved and unpleasant, but closer to something that is
parseable.)
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Try Opera 9.1 http://opera.com
event targets for
progress events. As far as I know, it is not a priori possible to know anything
about the progress in advance of the actual operation, so there is not much
point trying to anticipate that.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo e
e Document
section of the draft, please.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Try Opera 9.1 http://opera.com
ace without consulting the WebAPI Working Group.
But for generating the actual events defined in the spec, they should have the
null namespace, right? (Which is what Andy means)
cheers
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lære
where and when to fire these events. I
suppose it is also possible to write a spec for something that has multiple
operations firing progress - say, downloading a page and all its linked
resources. If someone wanted to do that.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standar
b/~checkout~/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/html/DOM3-Events.html
The proposal you referred to will be adopted. Our plan is to publish a new
version of the draft as soon as we can get the editor and a staff contact
together, which we hope will become a last call draft.
cheers
Chaals
--
and
> this one? (Ideally to the level of individual word and markup changes?)
No, I can't, sorry. Perhaps Gorm has time to give some reasonable level of
detail. The summary I can provide is "it is the TCP connection stuff out of the
spec".
Cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNev
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 06:17:14 +1100, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>> > I think the event 'progressError' should be 'error' for backwards
>> > compatibility.
...
>> The spec doesn&#x
o?
I think that using the word "ping" is a bad choice, since people who are used
to programmin expect it to be related to the ping command, rather than just
some local function for keep-alive or similar.
It seems to me that everybody is arguing that the example should do the same
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:45:25 +1100, Bjoern Hoehrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>>To+: Bjoern. Bjoern, could you please review this specification
>>for compatibility with DOM3 events?
>
> I've already made a number of comm
Hi folks.
Thanks to Gorm and the WHATWG, we have
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/network-api/network-api.html
Comments and brickbats welcome
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
To+: Bjoern. Bjoern, could you please review this specification for
compatibility with DOM3 events?
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:19:46 +1100, Ian Hickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>>
>> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:13:58 +1100, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 6, 2007, at 6:02 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>
>>
>> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/webapi/progress/
>> Progress.html?rev=1.8
>>
>> I would ap
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Try Opera 9.1 http://opera.com
; though you are correct that doing so creates interoperability risks.
Agreed. There is nothing in the spec that says either way about events it
doesn't actually define.
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Try Opera 9.1 http://opera.com
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 15:46:57 +1100, Charles McCathieNevile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:49:08 +1100, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Anne, Ian and I were discussing the fact that the Progress Events
>> spec re
ave a look. (If you want to talk
to someone who has worked there for 5 years, feel free to ask).
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Try Opera 9.1 http://opera.com
the
> upload-related events; XHR itself only dispatches the download events.
...
> This would require a change in XHR to adopt the Progress Events spec,
> but would considerably simplify Progress Events. Thoughts?
Works for me...
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Sta
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
